Commit 9adfac6d authored by Benjamin Coddington's avatar Benjamin Coddington Committed by J. Bruce Fields

lockd: Remove lm_compare_owner and lm_owner_key

Now that the NLM server allocates an nlm_lockowner for fl_owner, there's
no need for special hashing or comparison.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
parent 89e0edfb
......@@ -788,25 +788,7 @@ nlmsvc_notify_blocked(struct file_lock *fl)
printk(KERN_WARNING "lockd: notification for unknown block!\n");
}
static int nlmsvc_same_owner(struct file_lock *fl1, struct file_lock *fl2)
{
return fl1->fl_owner == fl2->fl_owner && fl1->fl_pid == fl2->fl_pid;
}
/*
* Since NLM uses two "keys" for tracking locks, we need to hash them down
* to one for the blocked_hash. Here, we're just xor'ing the host address
* with the pid in order to create a key value for picking a hash bucket.
*/
static unsigned long
nlmsvc_owner_key(struct file_lock *fl)
{
return (unsigned long)fl->fl_owner ^ (unsigned long)fl->fl_pid;
}
const struct lock_manager_operations nlmsvc_lock_operations = {
.lm_compare_owner = nlmsvc_same_owner,
.lm_owner_key = nlmsvc_owner_key,
.lm_notify = nlmsvc_notify_blocked,
.lm_grant = nlmsvc_grant_deferred,
};
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment