Commit 9c8e9b79 authored by Lyude Paul's avatar Lyude Paul

drm/nouveau/kms/nv140-: Don't modify depth in state during atomic commit

Currently, we modify the depth value stored in the atomic state when
performing a commit in order to workaround the fact we haven't
implemented support for depths higher then 10 yet. This isn't idempotent
though, as it will happen every atomic commit where we modify the OR
state even if the head's depth in the atomic state hasn't been modified.

Normally this wouldn't matter, since we don't modify OR state outside of
modesets, but since the CRC capture region is implemented as part of the
OR state in hardware we'll want to make sure all commits modifying OR
state are idempotent so as to avoid changing the depth unexpectedly.

So, fix this by simply not writing the reduced depth value we come up
with to the atomic state.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarDave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200627194657.156514-5-lyude@redhat.com
parent 5e6c2b4f
......@@ -27,17 +27,20 @@ static void
headc37d_or(struct nv50_head *head, struct nv50_head_atom *asyh)
{
struct nv50_dmac *core = &nv50_disp(head->base.base.dev)->core->chan;
u8 depth;
u32 *push;
if ((push = evo_wait(core, 2))) {
/*XXX: This is a dirty hack until OR depth handling is
* improved later for deep colour etc.
*/
switch (asyh->or.depth) {
case 6: asyh->or.depth = 5; break;
case 5: asyh->or.depth = 4; break;
case 2: asyh->or.depth = 1; break;
case 0: asyh->or.depth = 4; break;
case 6: depth = 5; break;
case 5: depth = 4; break;
case 2: depth = 1; break;
case 0: depth = 4; break;
default:
depth = asyh->or.depth;
WARN_ON(1);
break;
}
......
......@@ -27,17 +27,20 @@ static void
headc57d_or(struct nv50_head *head, struct nv50_head_atom *asyh)
{
struct nv50_dmac *core = &nv50_disp(head->base.base.dev)->core->chan;
u8 depth;
u32 *push;
if ((push = evo_wait(core, 2))) {
/*XXX: This is a dirty hack until OR depth handling is
* improved later for deep colour etc.
*/
switch (asyh->or.depth) {
case 6: asyh->or.depth = 5; break;
case 5: asyh->or.depth = 4; break;
case 2: asyh->or.depth = 1; break;
case 0: asyh->or.depth = 4; break;
case 6: depth = 5; break;
case 5: depth = 4; break;
case 2: depth = 1; break;
case 0: depth = 4; break;
default:
depth = asyh->or.depth;
WARN_ON(1);
break;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment