Commit 9d5f82c8 authored by Mathieu Poirier's avatar Mathieu Poirier Committed by Bjorn Andersson

remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation

Improve the readability of function rproc_alloc_firmware() by using
a non-negated condition and moving the comment out of the conditional
block
Suggested-by: default avatarAlex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420231601.16781-3-mathieu.poirier@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
parent 1487deda
...@@ -2011,14 +2011,14 @@ static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, ...@@ -2011,14 +2011,14 @@ static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc,
{ {
const char *p; const char *p;
if (!firmware) /*
/* * Allocate a firmware name if the caller gave us one to work
* If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then * with. Otherwise construct a new one using a default pattern.
* construct a default name. */
*/ if (firmware)
p = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "rproc-%s-fw", name);
else
p = kstrdup_const(firmware, GFP_KERNEL); p = kstrdup_const(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
else
p = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "rproc-%s-fw", name);
if (!p) if (!p)
return -ENOMEM; return -ENOMEM;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment