Commit 9e9aab5d authored by Catalin Marinas's avatar Catalin Marinas Committed by Zefan Li

futex: Ensure get_futex_key_refs() always implies a barrier

commit 76835b0e upstream.

Commit b0c29f79 (futexes: Avoid taking the hb->lock if there's
nothing to wake up) changes the futex code to avoid taking a lock when
there are no waiters. This code has been subsequently fixed in commit
11d4616b (futex: revert back to the explicit waiter counting code).
Both the original commit and the fix-up rely on get_futex_key_refs() to
always imply a barrier.

However, for private futexes, none of the cases in the switch statement
of get_futex_key_refs() would be hit and the function completes without
a memory barrier as required before checking the "waiters" in
futex_wake() -> hb_waiters_pending(). The consequence is a race with a
thread waiting on a futex on another CPU, allowing the waker thread to
read "waiters == 0" while the waiter thread to have read "futex_val ==
locked" (in kernel).

Without this fix, the problem (user space deadlocks) can be seen with
Android bionic's mutex implementation on an arm64 multi-cluster system.
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: default avatarMatteo Franchin <Matteo.Franchin@arm.com>
Fixes: b0c29f79 (futexes: Avoid taking the hb->lock if there's nothing to wake up)
Acked-by: default avatarDavidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Tested-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarZefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
parent e8ab53a5
......@@ -212,6 +212,8 @@ static void drop_futex_key_refs(union futex_key *key)
case FUT_OFF_MMSHARED:
mmdrop(key->private.mm);
break;
default:
smp_mb(); /* explicit MB (B) */
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment