Commit 9fb87fb3 authored by Matt Roper's avatar Matt Roper Committed by Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Clarify error message on failed workaround

Let's modify the "workaround lost" error message slightly to make it
more clear what the various numbers represent.  Also, the 'expected'
value needs to be &'d with wa->read so that it doesn't include the mask
bits for masked registers (those bits are write-only in the hardware and
will usually always read out as 0's).
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201231191103.854519-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
parent 4e5c8a99
......@@ -1383,9 +1383,9 @@ static bool
wa_verify(const struct i915_wa *wa, u32 cur, const char *name, const char *from)
{
if ((cur ^ wa->set) & wa->read) {
DRM_ERROR("%s workaround lost on %s! (%x=%x/%x, expected %x)\n",
DRM_ERROR("%s workaround lost on %s! (reg[%x]=0x%x, relevant bits were 0x%x vs expected 0x%x)\n",
name, from, i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa->reg),
cur, cur & wa->read, wa->set);
cur, cur & wa->read, wa->set & wa->read);
return false;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment