drm/xe: fix xe_device_mem_access_get() races
It looks like there is at least one race here, given that the pm_runtime_suspended() check looks to return false if we are in the process of suspending the device (RPM_SUSPENDING vs RPM_SUSPENDED). We later also do xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(), but since the device is suspending or has now suspended, this doesn't do anything either. Following from this we can potentially return from xe_device_mem_access_get() with the device suspended or about to be, leading to broken behaviour. Attempt to fix this by always grabbing the runtime ref when our internal ref transitions from 0 -> 1. The hard part is then dealing with the runtime_pm callbacks also calling xe_device_mem_access_get() and deadlocking, which the pm_runtime_suspended() check prevented. v2: - ct->lock looks to be primed with fs_reclaim, so holding that and then allocating memory will cause lockdep to complain. Now that we unconditionally grab the mem_access.lock around mem_access_{get,put}, we need to change the ordering wrt to grabbing the ct->lock, since some of the runtime_pm routines can allocate memory (or at least that's what lockdep seems to suggest). Hopefully not a big deal. It might be that there were already issues with this, just that the atomics where "hiding" the potential issues. v3: - Use Thomas Hellström' idea with tracking the active task that is executing in the resume or suspend callback, in order to avoid recursive resume/suspend calls deadlocking on itself. - Split the ct->lock change. v4: - Add smb_mb() around accessing the pm_callback_task for extra safety. (Thomas Hellström) v5: - Clarify the kernel-doc for the mem_access.lock, given that it is quite strange in what it protects (data vs code). The real motivation is to aid lockdep. (Rodrigo Vivi) v6: - Split out the lock change. We still want this as a lockdep aid but only for the xe_device_mem_access_get() path. Sticking a lock on the put() looks be a no-go, also the runtime_put() there is always async. - Now that the lock is gone move to atomics and rely on the pm code serialising multiple callers on the 0 -> 1 transition. - g2h_worker_func() looks to be the next issue, given that suspend-resume callbacks are using CT, so try to handle that. v7: - Add xe_device_mem_access_get_if_ongoing(), and use it in g2h_worker_func(). v8 (Anshuman): - Just always grab the rpm, instead of just on the 0 -> 1 transition, which is a lot clearer and simplifies the code quite a bit. v9: - Make sure we also adjust the CT fast-path with if-active. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/258Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Acked-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment