btrfs: Cleanup the old btrfs_worker.

Since all the btrfs_worker is replaced with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue, the old codes can be easily remove.
Signed-off-by: Quwenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

fs/btrfs/async-thread.h

@@ -20,106 +20,6 @@
 #ifndef __BTRFS_ASYNC_THREAD_
 #define __BTRFS_ASYNC_THREAD_
 
-struct btrfs_worker_thread;
-
-/*
- * This is similar to a workqueue, but it is meant to spread the operations
- * across all available cpus instead of just the CPU that was used to
- * queue the work.  There is also some batching introduced to try and
- * cut down on context switches.
- *
- * By default threads are added on demand up to 2 * the number of cpus.
- * Changing struct btrfs_workers->max_workers is one way to prevent
- * demand creation of kthreads.
- *
- * the basic model of these worker threads is to embed a btrfs_work
- * structure in your own data struct, and use container_of in a
- * work function to get back to your data struct.
- */
-struct btrfs_work {
-	/*
-	 * func should be set to the function you want called
-	 * your work struct is passed as the only arg
-	 *
-	 * ordered_func must be set for work sent to an ordered work queue,
-	 * and it is called to complete a given work item in the same
-	 * order they were sent to the queue.
-	 */
-	void (*func)(struct btrfs_work *work);
-	void (*ordered_func)(struct btrfs_work *work);
-	void (*ordered_free)(struct btrfs_work *work);
-
-	/*
-	 * flags should be set to zero.  It is used to make sure the
-	 * struct is only inserted once into the list.
-	 */
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	/* don't touch these */
-	struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker;
-	struct list_head list;
-	struct list_head order_list;
-};
-
-struct btrfs_workers {
-	/* current number of running workers */
-	int num_workers;
-
-	int num_workers_starting;
-
-	/* max number of workers allowed.  changed by btrfs_start_workers */
-	int max_workers;
-
-	/* once a worker has this many requests or fewer, it is idle */
-	int idle_thresh;
-
-	/* force completions in the order they were queued */
-	int ordered;
-
-	/* more workers required, but in an interrupt handler */
-	int atomic_start_pending;
-
-	/*
-	 * are we allowed to sleep while starting workers or are we required
-	 * to start them at a later time?  If we can't sleep, this indicates
-	 * which queue we need to use to schedule thread creation.
-	 */
-	struct btrfs_workers *atomic_worker_start;
-
-	/* list with all the work threads.  The workers on the idle thread
-	 * may be actively servicing jobs, but they haven't yet hit the
-	 * idle thresh limit above.
-	 */
-	struct list_head worker_list;
-	struct list_head idle_list;
-
-	/*
-	 * when operating in ordered mode, this maintains the list
-	 * of work items waiting for completion
-	 */
-	struct list_head order_list;
-	struct list_head prio_order_list;
-
-	/* lock for finding the next worker thread to queue on */
-	spinlock_t lock;
-
-	/* lock for the ordered lists */
-	spinlock_t order_lock;
-
-	/* extra name for this worker, used for current->name */
-	char *name;
-
-	int stopping;
-};
-
-void btrfs_queue_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers, struct btrfs_work *work);
-int btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers);
-void btrfs_stop_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers);
-void btrfs_init_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers, char *name, int max,
-			struct btrfs_workers *async_starter);
-void btrfs_requeue_work(struct btrfs_work *work);
-void btrfs_set_work_high_prio(struct btrfs_work *work);
-
 struct btrfs_workqueue_struct;
 /* Internal use only */
 struct __btrfs_workqueue_struct;

fs/btrfs/ctree.h

@@ -1504,7 +1504,6 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
 	 * A third pool does submit_bio to avoid deadlocking with the other
 	 * two
 	 */
-	struct btrfs_workers generic_worker;
 	struct btrfs_workqueue_struct *workers;
 	struct btrfs_workqueue_struct *delalloc_workers;
 	struct btrfs_workqueue_struct *flush_workers;

fs/btrfs/disk-io.c

@@ -1994,7 +1994,6 @@ static noinline int next_root_backup(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
 /* helper to cleanup workers */
 static void btrfs_stop_all_workers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 {
-	btrfs_stop_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker);
 	btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->fixup_workers);
 	btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->delalloc_workers);
 	btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->workers);
@@ -2472,8 +2471,6 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
 	}
 
 	max_active = fs_info->thread_pool_size;
-	btrfs_init_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker,
-			   "genwork", 1, NULL);
 
 	fs_info->workers =
 		btrfs_alloc_workqueue("worker", flags | WQ_HIGHPRI,
@@ -2526,15 +2523,6 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
 	fs_info->qgroup_rescan_workers =
 		btrfs_alloc_workqueue("qgroup-rescan", flags, 1, 0);
 
-	/*
-	 * btrfs_start_workers can really only fail because of ENOMEM so just
-	 * return -ENOMEM if any of these fail.
-	 */
-	ret = btrfs_start_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker);
-	if (ret) {
-		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto fail_sb_buffer;
-	}
 	if (!(fs_info->workers && fs_info->delalloc_workers &&
 	      fs_info->submit_workers && fs_info->flush_workers &&
 	      fs_info->endio_workers && fs_info->endio_meta_workers &&

fs/btrfs/super.c

@@ -1305,13 +1305,6 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int flags,
 	return ERR_PTR(error);
 }
 
-static void btrfs_set_max_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers, int new_limit)
-{
-	spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock);
-	workers->max_workers = new_limit;
-	spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock);
-}
-
 static void btrfs_resize_thread_pool(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 				     int new_pool_size, int old_pool_size)
 {
@@ -1323,7 +1316,6 @@ static void btrfs_resize_thread_pool(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	btrfs_info(fs_info, "resize thread pool %d -> %d",
 	       old_pool_size, new_pool_size);
 
-	btrfs_set_max_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker, new_pool_size);
 	btrfs_workqueue_set_max(fs_info->workers, new_pool_size);
 	btrfs_workqueue_set_max(fs_info->delalloc_workers, new_pool_size);
 	btrfs_workqueue_set_max(fs_info->submit_workers, new_pool_size);