Commit a1a8bed3 authored by Jin Yao's avatar Jin Yao Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf report: Tag branch type/flag on "to" and tag cycles on "from"

Current --branch-history LBR annotation displays confused data. For
example, each cycles report is duplicated on both "from" and "to"
entries.

For example:

  perf report --branch-history --no-children --stdio

  --2.32%--main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7% cycles:1)
            main div.c:44 (predicted:49.7% cycles:1)
            main div.c:42 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:2)
            compute_flag div.c:28 (cycles:2)
            compute_flag div.c:27 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:1)
            rand rand.c:28 (cycles:1)
            rand rand.c:28 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:1)
            __random random.c:298 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:297 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:9)

The cycles should be tagged only on the "from". It's for the code block
that ends with "from", not for "to".

Another issue is the "predicted:49.7%" is duplicated too (tag on both
"from" and "to").

This patch tags the branch type/flag on "to" and tag the cycles on
"from".

For example:

  --2.32%--main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7%)
            main div.c:44 (cycles:1)
            main div.c:42 (RET CROSS_2M)
            compute_flag div.c:28 (cycles:2)
            compute_flag div.c:27 (RET CROSS_2M)
            rand rand.c:28 (cycles:1)
            rand rand.c:28 (RET CROSS_2M)
            __random random.c:298 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:297 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M)
            __random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M)
            __random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (RET CROSS_2M)
            |
             --2.23%--__random_r random_r.c:392 (cycles:9)

In this example, The "main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7%)"
is "to" of branch and "main div.c:44 (cycles:1)" is "from" of branch.
It should be easier for understanding than before.
Signed-off-by: default avatarYao Jin <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1500894547-18411-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent b49a821e
......@@ -5,11 +5,12 @@
#include "../perf.h"
struct branch_type_stat {
u64 counts[PERF_BR_MAX];
u64 cond_fwd;
u64 cond_bwd;
u64 cross_4k;
u64 cross_2m;
bool branch_to;
u64 counts[PERF_BR_MAX];
u64 cond_fwd;
u64 cond_bwd;
u64 cross_4k;
u64 cross_2m;
};
struct branch_flags;
......
......@@ -563,20 +563,33 @@ fill_node(struct callchain_node *node, struct callchain_cursor *cursor)
if (cursor_node->branch) {
call->branch_count = 1;
if (cursor_node->branch_flags.predicted)
call->predicted_count = 1;
if (cursor_node->branch_flags.abort)
call->abort_count = 1;
call->cycles_count = cursor_node->branch_flags.cycles;
call->iter_count = cursor_node->nr_loop_iter;
call->samples_count = cursor_node->samples;
branch_type_count(&call->brtype_stat,
&cursor_node->branch_flags,
cursor_node->branch_from,
cursor_node->ip);
if (cursor_node->branch_from) {
/*
* branch_from is set with value somewhere else
* to imply it's "to" of a branch.
*/
call->brtype_stat.branch_to = true;
if (cursor_node->branch_flags.predicted)
call->predicted_count = 1;
if (cursor_node->branch_flags.abort)
call->abort_count = 1;
branch_type_count(&call->brtype_stat,
&cursor_node->branch_flags,
cursor_node->branch_from,
cursor_node->ip);
} else {
/*
* It's "from" of a branch
*/
call->brtype_stat.branch_to = false;
call->cycles_count =
cursor_node->branch_flags.cycles;
call->iter_count = cursor_node->nr_loop_iter;
call->samples_count = cursor_node->samples;
}
}
list_add_tail(&call->list, &node->val);
......@@ -685,20 +698,32 @@ static enum match_result match_chain(struct callchain_cursor_node *node,
if (node->branch) {
cnode->branch_count++;
if (node->branch_flags.predicted)
cnode->predicted_count++;
if (node->branch_flags.abort)
cnode->abort_count++;
cnode->cycles_count += node->branch_flags.cycles;
cnode->iter_count += node->nr_loop_iter;
cnode->samples_count += node->samples;
branch_type_count(&cnode->brtype_stat,
&node->branch_flags,
node->branch_from,
node->ip);
if (node->branch_from) {
/*
* It's "to" of a branch
*/
cnode->brtype_stat.branch_to = true;
if (node->branch_flags.predicted)
cnode->predicted_count++;
if (node->branch_flags.abort)
cnode->abort_count++;
branch_type_count(&cnode->brtype_stat,
&node->branch_flags,
node->branch_from,
node->ip);
} else {
/*
* It's "from" of a branch
*/
cnode->brtype_stat.branch_to = false;
cnode->cycles_count +=
node->branch_flags.cycles;
cnode->iter_count += node->nr_loop_iter;
cnode->samples_count += node->samples;
}
}
return MATCH_EQ;
......@@ -1236,27 +1261,26 @@ static int count_pri64_printf(int idx, const char *str, u64 value, char *bf, int
return printed;
}
static int count_float_printf(int idx, const char *str, float value, char *bf, int bfsize)
static int count_float_printf(int idx, const char *str, float value,
char *bf, int bfsize, float threshold)
{
int printed;
if (threshold != 0.0 && value < threshold)
return 0;
printed = scnprintf(bf, bfsize, "%s%s:%.1f%%", (idx) ? " " : " (", str, value);
return printed;
}
static int counts_str_build(char *bf, int bfsize,
u64 branch_count, u64 predicted_count,
u64 abort_count, u64 cycles_count,
u64 iter_count, u64 samples_count,
struct branch_type_stat *brtype_stat)
static int branch_to_str(char *bf, int bfsize,
u64 branch_count, u64 predicted_count,
u64 abort_count,
struct branch_type_stat *brtype_stat)
{
u64 cycles;
int printed, i = 0;
if (branch_count == 0)
return scnprintf(bf, bfsize, " (calltrace)");
printed = branch_type_str(brtype_stat, bf, bfsize);
if (printed)
i++;
......@@ -1264,15 +1288,29 @@ static int counts_str_build(char *bf, int bfsize,
if (predicted_count < branch_count) {
printed += count_float_printf(i++, "predicted",
predicted_count * 100.0 / branch_count,
bf + printed, bfsize - printed);
bf + printed, bfsize - printed, 0.0);
}
if (abort_count) {
printed += count_float_printf(i++, "abort",
abort_count * 100.0 / branch_count,
bf + printed, bfsize - printed);
bf + printed, bfsize - printed, 0.1);
}
if (i)
printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, bfsize - printed, ")");
return printed;
}
static int branch_from_str(char *bf, int bfsize,
u64 branch_count,
u64 cycles_count, u64 iter_count,
u64 samples_count)
{
int printed = 0, i = 0;
u64 cycles;
cycles = cycles_count / branch_count;
if (cycles) {
printed += count_pri64_printf(i++, "cycles",
......@@ -1287,10 +1325,34 @@ static int counts_str_build(char *bf, int bfsize,
}
if (i)
return scnprintf(bf + printed, bfsize - printed, ")");
printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, bfsize - printed, ")");
bf[0] = 0;
return 0;
return printed;
}
static int counts_str_build(char *bf, int bfsize,
u64 branch_count, u64 predicted_count,
u64 abort_count, u64 cycles_count,
u64 iter_count, u64 samples_count,
struct branch_type_stat *brtype_stat)
{
int printed;
if (branch_count == 0)
return scnprintf(bf, bfsize, " (calltrace)");
if (brtype_stat->branch_to) {
printed = branch_to_str(bf, bfsize, branch_count,
predicted_count, abort_count, brtype_stat);
} else {
printed = branch_from_str(bf, bfsize, branch_count,
cycles_count, iter_count, samples_count);
}
if (!printed)
bf[0] = 0;
return printed;
}
static int callchain_counts_printf(FILE *fp, char *bf, int bfsize,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment