lib/list_debug.c: print more list debugging context in __list_del_entry_valid()

Currently, the entry->prev and entry->next are considered to be valid as
long as they are not LIST_POISON{1|2}.  However, the memory may be
corrupted.  The prev->next is invalid probably because 'prev' is
invalid, not because prev->next's content is illegal.

Unfortunately, the printk and its subfunctions will modify the registers
that hold the 'prev' and 'next', and we don't see this valuable
information in the BUG context.

So print the contents of 'entry->prev' and 'entry->next'.

Here's an example:
  list_del corruption. prev->next should be c0ecbf74, but was c08410dc
  kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:53!
  ... ...
  PC is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x58/0x98
  LR is at __list_del_entry_valid+0x58/0x98
  psr: 60000093
  sp : c0ecbf30  ip : 00000000  fp : 00000001
  r10: c08410d0  r9 : 00000001  r8 : c0825e0c
  r7 : 20000013  r6 : c08410d0  r5 : c0ecbf74  r4 : c0ecbf74
  r3 : c0825d08  r2 : 00000000  r1 : df7ce6f4  r0 : 00000044
  ... ...
  Stack: (0xc0ecbf30 to 0xc0ecc000)
  bf20:                                     c0ecbf74 c0164fd0 c0ecbf70 c0165170
  bf40: c0eca000 c0840c00 c0840c00 c0824500 c0825e0c c0189bbc c088f404 60000013
  bf60: 60000013 c0e85100 000004ec 00000000 c0ebcdc0 c0ecbf74 c0ecbf74 c0825d08
  bf80: c0e807c0 c018965c 00000000 c013f2a0 c0e807c0 c013f154 00000000 00000000
  bfa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 c01001b0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
  bfc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
  bfe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 00000000 00000000
  (__list_del_entry_valid) from (__list_del_entry+0xc/0x20)
  (__list_del_entry) from (finish_swait+0x60/0x7c)
  (finish_swait) from (rcu_gp_kthread+0x560/0xa20)
  (rcu_gp_kthread) from (kthread+0x14c/0x15c)
  (kthread) from (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)

At first, I thought prev->next was overwritten.  Later, I carefully
analyzed the RCU code and the disassembly code.  The error occurred when
deleting a node from the list rcu_state.gp_wq.  The System.map shows
that the address of rcu_state is c0840c00.  Then I use gdb to obtain the
offset of rcu_state.gp_wq.task_list.

  (gdb) p &((struct rcu_state *)0)->gp_wq.task_list
  $1 = (struct list_head *) 0x4dc

Again:
  list_del corruption. prev->next should be c0ecbf74, but was c08410dc

  c08410dc = c0840c00 + 0x4dc = &rcu_state.gp_wq.task_list

Because rcu_state.gp_wq has at most one node, so I can guess that "prev
= &rcu_state.gp_wq.task_list".  But for other scenes, maybe I wasn't so
lucky, I cannot figure out the value of 'prev'.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211207025835.1909-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

lib/list_debug.c

@@ -49,11 +49,11 @@ bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
 			"list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
 			entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry,
-			"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px\n",
-			entry, prev->next) ||
+			"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px. (prev=%px)\n",
+			entry, prev->next, prev) ||
 	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry,
-			"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px\n",
-			entry, next->prev))
+			"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px. (next=%px)\n",
+			entry, next->prev, next))
 		return false;
 
 	return true;