Commit a366e300 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

ip6mr: remove synchronize_rcu() in favor of SOCK_RCU_FREE

Kirill found that recently added synchronize_rcu() call in
ip6mr_sk_done()
was slowing down netns dismantle and posted a patch to use it only if
the socket
was found.

I instead suggested to get rid of this call, and use instead
SOCK_RCU_FREE

We might later change IPv4 side to use the same technique and unify
both stacks. IPv4 does not use synchronize_rcu() but has a call_rcu()
that could be replaced by SOCK_RCU_FREE.

Tested:
 time for i in {1..1000}; do unshare -n /bin/false;done

 Before : real 7m18.911s
 After : real 10.187s

Fixes: 8571ab47 ("ip6mr: Make mroute_sk rcu-based")
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: default avatarKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 3f6be0eb
......@@ -1443,6 +1443,7 @@ static int ip6mr_sk_init(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sock *sk)
err = -EADDRINUSE;
} else {
rcu_assign_pointer(mrt->mroute_sk, sk);
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE);
net->ipv6.devconf_all->mc_forwarding++;
}
write_unlock_bh(&mrt_lock);
......@@ -1472,6 +1473,10 @@ int ip6mr_sk_done(struct sock *sk)
if (sk == rtnl_dereference(mrt->mroute_sk)) {
write_lock_bh(&mrt_lock);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(mrt->mroute_sk, NULL);
/* Note that mroute_sk had SOCK_RCU_FREE set,
* so the RCU grace period before sk freeing
* is guaranteed by sk_destruct()
*/
net->ipv6.devconf_all->mc_forwarding--;
write_unlock_bh(&mrt_lock);
inet6_netconf_notify_devconf(net, RTM_NEWNETCONF,
......@@ -1485,7 +1490,6 @@ int ip6mr_sk_done(struct sock *sk)
}
}
rtnl_unlock();
synchronize_rcu();
return err;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment