iwlwifi: dvm: prevent an out of bounds access

commit 0b0f934e upstream.

iwlagn_check_ratid_empty takes the tid as a parameter, but
it doesn't check that it is not IWL_TID_NON_QOS.
Since IWL_TID_NON_QOS = 8 and iwl_priv::tid_data is an array
with 8 entries, accessing iwl_priv::tid_data[IWL_TID_NON_QOS]
is a bad idea.
This happened in iwlagn_rx_reply_tx. Since
iwlagn_check_ratid_empty is relevant only to check whether
we can open A-MPDU, this flow is irrelevant if tid is
IWL_TID_NON_QOS. Call iwlagn_check_ratid_empty only inside
the
	if (tid != IWL_TID_NON_QOS)

a few lines earlier in the function.
Reported-by: Seraphime Kirkovski <kirkseraph@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Seraphime Kirkovski <kirkseraph@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c

@@ -1190,11 +1190,11 @@ void iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rx_cmd_buffer *rxb)
 				next_reclaimed;
 			IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d\n",
 						  next_reclaimed);
+			iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
 		}
 
 		iwl_trans_reclaim(priv->trans, txq_id, ssn, &skbs);
 
-		iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
 		freed = 0;
 
 		/* process frames */