Commit a5fc1441 authored by Michal Koutný's avatar Michal Koutný Committed by Jens Axboe

io_uring/sqpoll: Do not set PF_NO_SETAFFINITY on sqpoll threads

Users may specify a CPU where the sqpoll thread would run. This may
conflict with cpuset operations because of strict PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
requirement. That flag is unnecessary for polling "kernel" threads, see
the reasoning in commit 01e68ce0 ("io_uring/io-wq: stop setting
PF_NO_SETAFFINITY on io-wq workers"). Drop the flag on poll threads too.

Fixes: 01e68ce0 ("io_uring/io-wq: stop setting PF_NO_SETAFFINITY on io-wq workers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230314162559.pnyxdllzgw7jozgx@blackpad/Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230314183332.25834-1-mkoutny@suse.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent fa780334
...@@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data) ...@@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(sqd->sq_cpu)); set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(sqd->sq_cpu));
else else
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpu_online_mask); set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpu_online_mask);
current->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
mutex_lock(&sqd->lock); mutex_lock(&sqd->lock);
while (1) { while (1) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment