block: kyber: make kyber more friendly with merging
Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens of one domain is used up, kyber will try to dispatch requests from other domain and flush the rq_list there. To improve this, we setup kyber_ctx_queue (kcq) which is similar with ctx, but it has rq_lists for different domain and build same mapping between kcq and khd as the ctx & hctx. Then we could merge, insert and dispatch for different domains separately. At the same time, only flush the rq_list of kcq when get domain token successfully. Then if one domain token is used up, the requests could be left in the rq_list of that domain and maybe merged with following io. Following is my test result on machine with 8 cores and NVMe card INTEL SSDPEKKR128G7 fio size=256m ioengine=libaio iodepth=64 direct=1 numjobs=8 seq/random +------+---------------------------------------------------------------+ |patch?| bw(MB/s) | iops | slat(usec) | clat(usec) | merge | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | w/o | 606/612 | 151k/153k | 6.89/7.03 | 3349.21/3305.40 | 0/0 | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | w/ | 1083/616 | 277k/154k | 4.93/6.95 | 1830.62/3279.95 | 223k/3k | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ When set numjobs to 16, the bw and iops could reach 1662MB/s and 425k on my platform. Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment