Commit a6369741 authored by Sage Weil's avatar Sage Weil

ceph: fix comments, locking in destroy_inode

The destroy_inode path needs no inode locks since there are no
inode references.  Update __ceph_remove_cap comment to reflect
that it is called without cap->session->s_mutex in this case.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
parent 4ce1e9ad
......@@ -856,8 +856,8 @@ static int __ceph_is_any_caps(struct ceph_inode_info *ci)
}
/*
* caller should hold i_lock, and session s_mutex.
* returns true if this is the last cap. if so, caller should iput.
* caller should hold i_lock.
* caller will not hold session s_mutex if called from destroy_inode.
*/
void __ceph_remove_cap(struct ceph_cap *cap)
{
......@@ -974,15 +974,14 @@ static int send_cap_msg(struct ceph_mds_session *session,
}
/*
* Queue cap releases when an inode is dropped from our
* cache.
* Queue cap releases when an inode is dropped from our cache. Since
* inode is about to be destroyed, there is no need for i_lock.
*/
void ceph_queue_caps_release(struct inode *inode)
{
struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
struct rb_node *p;
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
p = rb_first(&ci->i_caps);
while (p) {
struct ceph_cap *cap = rb_entry(p, struct ceph_cap, ci_node);
......@@ -1024,9 +1023,7 @@ void ceph_queue_caps_release(struct inode *inode)
spin_unlock(&session->s_cap_lock);
p = rb_next(p);
__ceph_remove_cap(cap);
}
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment