Commit a6476ebd authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Stop dropping irq around resets

A long time ago, we were afraid of handling interrupts and signaling
waiters during a reset, worrying that the confusion in request handling
would interfere with our attempts to process the reset in an orderly
fashion. Since then, we have isolated our irq-driven request handling by
virtue of the engine->timeline.lock and control of kthreads where
required, eliminating the danger of concurrently processing interrupts.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180806145647.13131-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent 08e3e21a
......@@ -1918,7 +1918,6 @@ void i915_reset(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
dev_notice(i915->drm.dev, "Resetting chip for %s\n", reason);
error->reset_count++;
disable_irq(i915->drm.irq);
ret = i915_gem_reset_prepare(i915);
if (ret) {
dev_err(i915->drm.dev, "GPU recovery failed\n");
......@@ -1980,8 +1979,6 @@ void i915_reset(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
finish:
i915_gem_reset_finish(i915);
enable_irq(i915->drm.irq);
wakeup:
clear_bit(I915_RESET_HANDOFF, &error->flags);
wake_up_bit(&error->flags, I915_RESET_HANDOFF);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment