Commit a8e03b6b authored by David Vernet's avatar David Vernet Committed by Andrii Nakryiko

bpf: Allow invoking kfuncs from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL progs

Currently, a set of core BPF kfuncs (e.g. bpf_task_*, bpf_cgroup_*,
bpf_cpumask_*, etc) cannot be invoked from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL
programs. The whitelist approach taken for enabling kfuncs makes sense:
it not safe to call these kfuncs from every program type. For example,
it may not be safe to call bpf_task_acquire() in an fentry to
free_task().

BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, on the other hand, is a perfectly safe program
type from which to invoke these kfuncs, as it's a very controlled
environment, and we should never be able to run into any of the typical
problems such as recursive invoations, acquiring references on freeing
kptrs, etc. Being able to invoke these kfuncs would be useful, as
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL can be invoked with BPF_PROG_RUN, and would
therefore enable user space programs to synchronously call into BPF to
manipulate these kptrs.

This patch therefore enables invoking the aforementioned core kfuncs
from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL progs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240405143041.632519-2-void@manifault.com
parent 00d5d22a
...@@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ static int __init cpumask_kfunc_init(void) ...@@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ static int __init cpumask_kfunc_init(void)
ret = bpf_mem_alloc_init(&bpf_cpumask_ma, sizeof(struct bpf_cpumask), false); ret = bpf_mem_alloc_init(&bpf_cpumask_ma, sizeof(struct bpf_cpumask), false);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &cpumask_kfunc_set); ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &cpumask_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, &cpumask_kfunc_set); ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, &cpumask_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &cpumask_kfunc_set);
return ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(cpumask_dtors, return ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(cpumask_dtors,
ARRAY_SIZE(cpumask_dtors), ARRAY_SIZE(cpumask_dtors),
THIS_MODULE); THIS_MODULE);
......
...@@ -2653,6 +2653,7 @@ static int __init kfunc_init(void) ...@@ -2653,6 +2653,7 @@ static int __init kfunc_init(void)
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &generic_kfunc_set); ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &generic_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &generic_kfunc_set); ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &generic_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, &generic_kfunc_set); ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, &generic_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &generic_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(generic_dtors, ret = ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(generic_dtors,
ARRAY_SIZE(generic_dtors), ARRAY_SIZE(generic_dtors),
THIS_MODULE); THIS_MODULE);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment