Commit a9877cc2 authored by Richard Kennedy's avatar Richard Kennedy Committed by Linus Torvalds

buffer_head: remove redundant test from wait_on_buffer

The comment suggests that when b_count equals zero it is calling
__wait_no_buffer to trigger some debug, but as there is no debug in
__wait_on_buffer the whole thing is redundant.

AFAICT from the git log this has been the case for at least 5 years, so
it seems safe just to remove this.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 76545066
...@@ -314,15 +314,10 @@ map_bh(struct buffer_head *bh, struct super_block *sb, sector_t block) ...@@ -314,15 +314,10 @@ map_bh(struct buffer_head *bh, struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
bh->b_size = sb->s_blocksize; bh->b_size = sb->s_blocksize;
} }
/*
* Calling wait_on_buffer() for a zero-ref buffer is illegal, so we call into
* __wait_on_buffer() just to trip a debug check. Because debug code in inline
* functions is bloaty.
*/
static inline void wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh) static inline void wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
{ {
might_sleep(); might_sleep();
if (buffer_locked(bh) || atomic_read(&bh->b_count) == 0) if (buffer_locked(bh))
__wait_on_buffer(bh); __wait_on_buffer(bh);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment