Commit aaaffb83 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Convert wait_for(I915_READ(reg)) to intel_wait_for_register()

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-59-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent 84a6e1d7
......@@ -256,8 +256,11 @@ void intel_sbi_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u16 reg, u32 value,
tmp = SBI_CTL_DEST_MPHY | SBI_CTL_OP_IOWR;
I915_WRITE(SBI_CTL_STAT, SBI_BUSY | tmp);
if (wait_for((I915_READ(SBI_CTL_STAT) & (SBI_BUSY | SBI_RESPONSE_FAIL)) == 0,
100)) {
if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
SBI_CTL_STAT,
SBI_BUSY | SBI_RESPONSE_FAIL,
0,
100)) {
DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for SBI to complete write transaction\n");
return;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment