Commit ab00db21 authored by Michal Hocko's avatar Michal Hocko Committed by Linus Torvalds

include/linux/gfp.h: clarify usage of GFP_ATOMIC in !preemptible contexts

There is a general understanding that GFP_ATOMIC/GFP_NOWAIT are to be used
from atomic contexts.  E.g.  from within a spin lock or from the IRQ
context.  This is correct but there are some atomic contexts where the
above doesn't hold.  One of them would be an NMI context.  Page allocator
has never supported that and the general fear of this context didn't let
anybody to actually even try to use the allocator there.  Good, but let's
be more specific about that.

Another such a context, and that is where people seem to be more daring,
is raw_spin_lock.  Mostly because it simply resembles regular spin lock
which is supported by the allocator and there is not any implementation
difference with !RT kernels in the first place.  Be explicit that such a
context is not supported by the allocator.  The underlying reason is that
zone->lock would have to become raw_spin_lock as well and that has turned
out to be a problem for RT
(http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mu305c1w.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de).
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarUladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929123010.5137-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent e320d301
...@@ -238,7 +238,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct; ...@@ -238,7 +238,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
* %__GFP_FOO flags as necessary. * %__GFP_FOO flags as necessary.
* *
* %GFP_ATOMIC users can not sleep and need the allocation to succeed. A lower * %GFP_ATOMIC users can not sleep and need the allocation to succeed. A lower
* watermark is applied to allow access to "atomic reserves" * watermark is applied to allow access to "atomic reserves".
* The current implementation doesn't support NMI and few other strict
* non-preemptive contexts (e.g. raw_spin_lock). The same applies to %GFP_NOWAIT.
* *
* %GFP_KERNEL is typical for kernel-internal allocations. The caller requires * %GFP_KERNEL is typical for kernel-internal allocations. The caller requires
* %ZONE_NORMAL or a lower zone for direct access but can direct reclaim. * %ZONE_NORMAL or a lower zone for direct access but can direct reclaim.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment