Commit ab4b6496 authored by Harald Geyer's avatar Harald Geyer Committed by Jonathan Cameron

iio: dht11: Improve logging

* Unify log messages
* Add more DEBUG messages

Apparently this driver is working unreliably on some platforms that I can't
test. Therefore I want an easy way for bug reporters to provide useful
information without making the driver too chatty by default.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHarald Geyer <harald@ccbib.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
parent ff5c37e3
......@@ -96,6 +96,24 @@ struct dht11 {
struct {s64 ts; int value; } edges[DHT11_EDGES_PER_READ];
};
#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
/*
* dht11_edges_print: show the data as actually received by the
* driver.
*/
static void dht11_edges_print(struct dht11 *dht11)
{
int i;
dev_dbg(dht11->dev, "%d edges detected:\n", dht11->num_edges);
for (i = 1; i < dht11->num_edges; ++i) {
dev_dbg(dht11->dev, "%d: %lld ns %s\n", i,
dht11->edges[i].ts - dht11->edges[i - 1].ts,
dht11->edges[i - 1].value ? "high" : "low");
}
}
#endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG */
static unsigned char dht11_decode_byte(char *bits)
{
unsigned char ret = 0;
......@@ -119,8 +137,12 @@ static int dht11_decode(struct dht11 *dht11, int offset)
for (i = 0; i < DHT11_BITS_PER_READ; ++i) {
t = dht11->edges[offset + 2 * i + 2].ts -
dht11->edges[offset + 2 * i + 1].ts;
if (!dht11->edges[offset + 2 * i + 1].value)
return -EIO; /* lost synchronisation */
if (!dht11->edges[offset + 2 * i + 1].value) {
dev_dbg(dht11->dev,
"lost synchronisation at edge %d\n",
offset + 2 * i + 1);
return -EIO;
}
bits[i] = t > DHT11_THRESHOLD;
}
......@@ -130,8 +152,10 @@ static int dht11_decode(struct dht11 *dht11, int offset)
temp_dec = dht11_decode_byte(&bits[24]);
checksum = dht11_decode_byte(&bits[32]);
if (((hum_int + hum_dec + temp_int + temp_dec) & 0xff) != checksum)
if (((hum_int + hum_dec + temp_int + temp_dec) & 0xff) != checksum) {
dev_dbg(dht11->dev, "invalid checksum\n");
return -EIO;
}
dht11->timestamp = ktime_get_boot_ns();
if (hum_int < 20) { /* DHT22 */
......@@ -182,6 +206,7 @@ static int dht11_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
mutex_lock(&dht11->lock);
if (dht11->timestamp + DHT11_DATA_VALID_TIME < ktime_get_boot_ns()) {
timeres = ktime_get_resolution_ns();
dev_dbg(dht11->dev, "current timeresolution: %dns\n", timeres);
if (timeres > DHT11_MIN_TIMERES) {
dev_err(dht11->dev, "timeresolution %dns too low\n",
timeres);
......@@ -219,10 +244,13 @@ static int dht11_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
free_irq(dht11->irq, iio_dev);
#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
dht11_edges_print(dht11);
#endif
if (ret == 0 && dht11->num_edges < DHT11_EDGES_PER_READ - 1) {
dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
"Only %d signal edges detected\n",
dht11->num_edges);
dev_err(dht11->dev, "Only %d signal edges detected\n",
dht11->num_edges);
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
}
if (ret < 0)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment