Commit ab6211c9 authored by Will Deacon's avatar Will Deacon

arm64: debug: Clean up brk_handler()

brk_handler() now looks pretty strange and can be refactored to drop its
funny 'handler_found' local variable altogether.
Reviewed-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
parent 453b7740
......@@ -331,14 +331,12 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(call_break_hook);
static int brk_handler(unsigned long unused, unsigned int esr,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
bool handler_found = false;
if (!handler_found && call_break_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
handler_found = true;
if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
return 0;
if (!handler_found && user_mode(regs)) {
if (user_mode(regs)) {
send_user_sigtrap(TRAP_BRKPT);
} else if (!handler_found) {
} else {
pr_warn("Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment