drm/xe: Suppress missing outer rpm protection warning

Do not raise a WARN if we are likely within suspending or resuming
path. This is likely this false positive:

rpm_status:           0000:03:00.0 status=RPM_SUSPENDING
console:              xe_bo_evict_all (called from suspend)
xe_sched_job_create:  dev=0000:03:00.0, ...
xe_sched_job_exec:    dev=0000:03:00.0, ...
xe_pm_runtime_put:    dev=0000:03:00.0, ...
xe_sched_job_run:     dev=0000:03:00.0, ...
rpm_usage:            0000:03:00.0 flags-0 cnt-2  ...
rpm_usage:            0000:03:00.0 flags-0 cnt-2  ...
rpm_usage:            0000:03:00.0 flags-0 cnt-2  ...
console:              xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Missing outer runtime
                                                     PM protection
console:               xe_guc_ct_send+0x15/0x50 [xe]
console:               guc_exec_queue_run_job+0x1509/0x3950 [xe]
[snip]
console:               drm_sched_run_job_work+0x649/0xc20

At this point, BOs are getting evicted from VRAM with rpm
usage-counter = 2, but rpm status = SUSPENDING.

The xe->pm_callback_task won't be equal 'current' because this call is
coming from a work queue.

So, pm_runtime_get_if_active() will be called and return 0 because rpm
status != ACTIVE (but equal SUSPENDING or RESUMING).

v2: Still get the reference even on non suspending/resuming
    path (Jonathan, Brost).

Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240905140215.56404-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit cb85e39dc5d1717fab82810984cce0e54712a3c2)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c

@@ -595,6 +595,18 @@ bool xe_pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(struct xe_device *xe)
 	return pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(xe->drm.dev) > 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Very unreliable! Should only be used to suppress the false positive case
+ * in the missing outer rpm protection warning.
+ */
+static bool xe_pm_suspending_or_resuming(struct xe_device *xe)
+{
+	struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
+
+	return dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING ||
+		dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_RESUMING;
+}
+
 /**
  * xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume - Bump runtime PM usage counter without resuming
  * @xe: xe device instance
@@ -611,8 +623,11 @@ void xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(struct xe_device *xe)
 
 	ref = xe_pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(xe);
 
-	if (drm_WARN(&xe->drm, !ref, "Missing outer runtime PM protection\n"))
+	if (!ref) {
 		pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe->drm.dev);
+		drm_WARN(&xe->drm, !xe_pm_suspending_or_resuming(xe),
+			 "Missing outer runtime PM protection\n");
+	}
 }
 
 /**