Commit adb21d2b authored by Aleksa Sarai's avatar Aleksa Sarai Committed by Al Viro

namei: LOOKUP_BENEATH: O_BENEATH-like scoped resolution

/* Background. */
There are many circumstances when userspace wants to resolve a path and
ensure that it doesn't go outside of a particular root directory during
resolution. Obvious examples include archive extraction tools, as well as
other security-conscious userspace programs. FreeBSD spun out O_BENEATH
from their Capsicum project[1,2], so it also seems reasonable to
implement similar functionality for Linux.

This is part of a refresh of Al's AT_NO_JUMPS patchset[3] (which was a
variation on David Drysdale's O_BENEATH patchset[4], which in turn was
based on the Capsicum project[5]).

/* Userspace API. */
LOOKUP_BENEATH will be exposed to userspace through openat2(2).

/* Semantics. */
Unlike most other LOOKUP flags (most notably LOOKUP_FOLLOW),
LOOKUP_BENEATH applies to all components of the path.

With LOOKUP_BENEATH, any path component which attempts to "escape" the
starting point of the filesystem lookup (the dirfd passed to openat)
will yield -EXDEV. Thus, all absolute paths and symlinks are disallowed.

Due to a security concern brought up by Jann[6], any ".." path
components are also blocked. This restriction will be lifted in a future
patch, but requires more work to ensure that permitting ".." is done
safely.

Magic-link jumps are also blocked, because they can beam the path lookup
across the starting point. It would be possible to detect and block
only the "bad" crossings with path_is_under() checks, but it's unclear
whether it makes sense to permit magic-links at all. However, userspace
is recommended to pass LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS if they want to ensure that
magic-link crossing is entirely disabled.

/* Testing. */
LOOKUP_BENEATH is tested as part of the openat2(2) selftests.

[1]: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2808
[2]: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17547
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170429220414.GT29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1415094884-18349-1-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com/
[5]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1404124096-21445-1-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com/
[6]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAG48ez1jzNvxB+bfOBnERFGp=oMM0vHWuLD6EULmne3R6xa53w@mail.gmail.com/

Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarDavid Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Suggested-by: default avatarAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent 72ba2929
......@@ -641,6 +641,14 @@ static bool legitimize_links(struct nameidata *nd)
static bool legitimize_root(struct nameidata *nd)
{
/*
* For scoped-lookups (where nd->root has been zeroed), we need to
* restart the whole lookup from scratch -- because set_root() is wrong
* for these lookups (nd->dfd is the root, not the filesystem root).
*/
if (!nd->root.mnt && (nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
return false;
/* Nothing to do if nd->root is zero or is managed by the VFS user. */
if (!nd->root.mnt || (nd->flags & LOOKUP_ROOT))
return true;
nd->flags |= LOOKUP_ROOT_GRABBED;
......@@ -776,12 +784,37 @@ static int complete_walk(struct nameidata *nd)
int status;
if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_ROOT))
/*
* We don't want to zero nd->root for scoped-lookups or
* externally-managed nd->root.
*/
if (!(nd->flags & (LOOKUP_ROOT | LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED)))
nd->root.mnt = NULL;
if (unlikely(unlazy_walk(nd)))
return -ECHILD;
}
if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED)) {
/*
* While the guarantee of LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED is (roughly) "don't
* ever step outside the root during lookup" and should already
* be guaranteed by the rest of namei, we want to avoid a namei
* BUG resulting in userspace being given a path that was not
* scoped within the root at some point during the lookup.
*
* So, do a final sanity-check to make sure that in the
* worst-case scenario (a complete bypass of LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED)
* we won't silently return an fd completely outside of the
* requested root to userspace.
*
* Userspace could move the path outside the root after this
* check, but as discussed elsewhere this is not a concern (the
* resolved file was inside the root at some point).
*/
if (!path_is_under(&nd->path, &nd->root))
return -EXDEV;
}
if (likely(!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_JUMPED)))
return 0;
......@@ -802,6 +835,14 @@ static int set_root(struct nameidata *nd)
{
struct fs_struct *fs = current->fs;
/*
* Jumping to the real root in a scoped-lookup is a BUG in namei, but we
* still have to ensure it doesn't happen because it will cause a breakout
* from the dirfd.
*/
if (WARN_ON(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
return -ENOTRECOVERABLE;
if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
unsigned seq;
......@@ -838,6 +879,8 @@ static inline void path_to_nameidata(const struct path *path,
static int nd_jump_root(struct nameidata *nd)
{
if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
return -EXDEV;
if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_NO_XDEV)) {
/* Absolute path arguments to path_init() are allowed. */
if (nd->path.mnt != NULL && nd->path.mnt != nd->root.mnt)
......@@ -883,6 +926,9 @@ int nd_jump_link(struct path *path)
if (nd->path.mnt != path->mnt)
goto err;
}
/* Not currently safe for scoped-lookups. */
if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
goto err;
path_put(&nd->path);
nd->path = *path;
......@@ -1385,8 +1431,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
while (1) {
if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
return -ECHILD;
break;
}
if (nd->path.dentry != nd->path.mnt->mnt_root) {
struct dentry *old = nd->path.dentry;
struct dentry *parent = old->d_parent;
......@@ -1516,9 +1565,12 @@ static int path_parent_directory(struct path *path)
static int follow_dotdot(struct nameidata *nd)
{
while(1) {
if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
while (1) {
if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
return -EXDEV;
break;
}
if (nd->path.dentry != nd->path.mnt->mnt_root) {
int ret = path_parent_directory(&nd->path);
if (ret)
......@@ -1741,6 +1793,13 @@ static inline int handle_dots(struct nameidata *nd, int type)
if (type == LAST_DOTDOT) {
int error = 0;
/*
* Scoped-lookup flags resolving ".." is not currently safe --
* races can cause our parent to have moved outside of the root
* and us to skip over it.
*/
if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
return -EXDEV;
if (!nd->root.mnt) {
error = set_root(nd);
if (error)
......@@ -2258,7 +2317,6 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
get_fs_pwd(current->fs, &nd->path);
nd->inode = nd->path.dentry->d_inode;
}
return s;
} else {
/* Caller must check execute permissions on the starting path component */
struct fd f = fdget_raw(nd->dfd);
......@@ -2283,8 +2341,18 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
nd->inode = nd->path.dentry->d_inode;
}
fdput(f);
return s;
}
/* For scoped-lookups we need to set the root to the dirfd as well. */
if (flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED) {
nd->root = nd->path;
if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
nd->root_seq = nd->seq;
} else {
path_get(&nd->root);
nd->flags |= LOOKUP_ROOT_GRABBED;
}
}
return s;
}
static const char *trailing_symlink(struct nameidata *nd)
......
......@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_NAMEI_H
#define _LINUX_NAMEI_H
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/path.h>
#include <linux/fcntl.h>
......@@ -43,6 +44,9 @@ enum {LAST_NORM, LAST_ROOT, LAST_DOT, LAST_DOTDOT, LAST_BIND};
#define LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS 0x010000 /* No symlink crossing. */
#define LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS 0x020000 /* No nd_jump_link() crossing. */
#define LOOKUP_NO_XDEV 0x040000 /* No mountpoint crossing. */
#define LOOKUP_BENEATH 0x080000 /* No escaping from starting point. */
/* LOOKUP_* flags which do scope-related checks based on the dirfd. */
#define LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED LOOKUP_BENEATH
extern int path_pts(struct path *path);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment