Commit ae775faa authored by Ping-Ke Shih's avatar Ping-Ke Shih Committed by Kalle Valo

wifi: rtw89: add to display hardware rates v1 histogram in debugfs

The upcoming WiFi 7 chips support EHT rates, and hardware rate codes are
changed too, so modify to adapt the changes. (EHT counters are still zeros
in below example)

RX count:
   Legacy: [0, 0, 0, 0]
     OFDM: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
     HT 0: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
     HT 1: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
  VHT 1SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0][0, 0]
  VHT 2SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0][0, 0]
   HE 1SS: [0, 0, 42, 0, 43, 90, 75, 0, 26, 20, 260, 7]
   HE 2SS: [0, 96, 232, 84, 125, 184, 52, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
  EHT 1SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0][0, 0]
  EHT 2SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Signed-off-by: default avatarPing-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728070252.66525-10-pkshih@realtek.com
parent 5c152231
......@@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ enum rtw89_hw_rate {
RTW89_HW_RATE_V1_EHT_NSS4_MCS13 = 0x46D,
RTW89_HW_RATE_NR,
RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL,
RTW89_HW_RATE_MASK_MOD = GENMASK(8, 7),
RTW89_HW_RATE_MASK_VAL = GENMASK(6, 0),
......
......@@ -3325,20 +3325,26 @@ rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(struct seq_file *m, struct rtw89_pkt_stat *pkt_stat,
pkt_stat->rx_rate_cnt[first_rate + i]);
}
#define FIRST_RATE_SAME(rate) {RTW89_HW_RATE_ ## rate, RTW89_HW_RATE_ ## rate}
#define FIRST_RATE_ENUM(rate) {RTW89_HW_RATE_ ## rate, RTW89_HW_RATE_V1_ ## rate}
#define FIRST_RATE_GEV1(rate) {RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL, RTW89_HW_RATE_V1_ ## rate}
static const struct rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_info {
enum rtw89_hw_rate first_rate;
enum rtw89_hw_rate first_rate[RTW89_CHIP_GEN_NUM];
int len;
int ext;
const char *rate_mode;
} rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_infos[] = {
{RTW89_HW_RATE_CCK1, 4, 0, "Legacy:"},
{RTW89_HW_RATE_OFDM6, 8, 0, "OFDM:"},
{RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS0, 8, 0, "HT 0:"},
{RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS8, 8, 0, "HT 1:"},
{RTW89_HW_RATE_VHT_NSS1_MCS0, 10, 2, "VHT 1SS:"},
{RTW89_HW_RATE_VHT_NSS2_MCS0, 10, 2, "VHT 2SS:"},
{RTW89_HW_RATE_HE_NSS1_MCS0, 12, 0, "HE 1SS:"},
{RTW89_HW_RATE_HE_NSS2_MCS0, 12, 0, "HE 2ss:"},
{FIRST_RATE_SAME(CCK1), 4, 0, "Legacy:"},
{FIRST_RATE_SAME(OFDM6), 8, 0, "OFDM:"},
{FIRST_RATE_ENUM(MCS0), 8, 0, "HT 0:"},
{FIRST_RATE_ENUM(MCS8), 8, 0, "HT 1:"},
{FIRST_RATE_ENUM(VHT_NSS1_MCS0), 10, 2, "VHT 1SS:"},
{FIRST_RATE_ENUM(VHT_NSS2_MCS0), 10, 2, "VHT 2SS:"},
{FIRST_RATE_ENUM(HE_NSS1_MCS0), 12, 0, "HE 1SS:"},
{FIRST_RATE_ENUM(HE_NSS2_MCS0), 12, 0, "HE 2SS:"},
{FIRST_RATE_GEV1(EHT_NSS1_MCS0), 14, 2, "EHT 1SS:"},
{FIRST_RATE_GEV1(EHT_NSS2_MCS0), 14, 0, "EHT 2SS:"},
};
static int rtw89_debug_priv_phy_info_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
......@@ -3347,7 +3353,9 @@ static int rtw89_debug_priv_phy_info_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = debugfs_priv->rtwdev;
struct rtw89_traffic_stats *stats = &rtwdev->stats;
struct rtw89_pkt_stat *pkt_stat = &rtwdev->phystat.last_pkt_stat;
const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
const struct rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_info *info;
enum rtw89_hw_rate first_rate;
int i;
seq_printf(m, "TP TX: %u [%u] Mbps (lv: %d), RX: %u [%u] Mbps (lv: %d)\n",
......@@ -3359,15 +3367,20 @@ static int rtw89_debug_priv_phy_info_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
stats->rx_avg_len);
seq_puts(m, "RX count:\n");
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_infos); i++) {
info = &rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_infos[i];
first_rate = info->first_rate[chip->chip_gen];
if (first_rate >= RTW89_HW_RATE_NR)
continue;
seq_printf(m, "%10s [", info->rate_mode);
rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(m, pkt_stat,
info->first_rate, info->len);
first_rate, info->len);
if (info->ext) {
seq_puts(m, "][");
rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(m, pkt_stat,
info->first_rate + info->len, info->ext);
first_rate + info->len, info->ext);
}
seq_puts(m, "]\n");
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment