Commit aeaf117c authored by Justin Tee's avatar Justin Tee Committed by Martin K. Petersen

scsi: lpfc: Relax PRLI issue conditions after GID_FT response

If previously in REG_LOGIN_ISSUE state, then remove the requirement that
PLOGI must have been received from the remote port before issuing a PRLI.
After GID_FT completes, it does not matter whether the driver itself sent a
PLOGI or received one.  The fact that we're in REG_LOGIN_ISSUE state simply
means that the next state should be issuing the PRLI to continue discovery
of the remote port.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJustin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628172011.25921-4-justintee8345@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
parent 9609385d
......@@ -1553,22 +1553,14 @@ lpfc_cmpl_ct_cmd_gft_id(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *cmdiocb,
if (ndlp->nlp_state == NLP_STE_REG_LOGIN_ISSUE &&
ndlp->nlp_fc4_type) {
ndlp->nlp_prev_state = NLP_STE_REG_LOGIN_ISSUE;
/* This is a fabric topology so if discovery
* started with an unsolicited PLOGI, don't
* send a PRLI. Targets don't issue PLOGI or
* PRLI when acting as a target. Likely this is
* an initiator function.
*/
if (!(ndlp->nlp_flag & NLP_RCV_PLOGI)) {
lpfc_nlp_set_state(vport, ndlp,
NLP_STE_PRLI_ISSUE);
lpfc_issue_els_prli(vport, ndlp, 0);
}
lpfc_nlp_set_state(vport, ndlp,
NLP_STE_PRLI_ISSUE);
lpfc_issue_els_prli(vport, ndlp, 0);
} else if (!ndlp->nlp_fc4_type) {
/* If fc4 type is still unknown, then LOGO */
lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_INFO,
LOG_DISCOVERY | LOG_NODE,
"6443 Sending LOGO ndlp x%px,"
"6443 Sending LOGO ndlp x%px, "
"DID x%06x with fc4_type: "
"x%08x, state: %d\n",
ndlp, did, ndlp->nlp_fc4_type,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment