Commit af0efa05 authored by Toke Høiland-Jørgensen's avatar Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Committed by Andrii Nakryiko

libbpf: Restore errno return for functions that were already returning it

The update to streamline libbpf error reporting intended to change all
functions to return the errno as a negative return value if
LIBBPF_STRICT_DIRECT_ERRS is set. However, if the flag is *not* set, the
return value changes for the two functions that were already returning a
negative errno unconditionally: bpf_link__unpin() and perf_buffer__poll().

This is a user-visible API change that breaks applications; so let's revert
these two functions back to unconditionally returning a negative errno
value.

Fixes: e9fc3ce9 ("libbpf: Streamline error reporting for high-level APIs")
Signed-off-by: default avatarToke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210706122355.236082-1-toke@redhat.com
parent bc832065
...@@ -10136,7 +10136,7 @@ int bpf_link__unpin(struct bpf_link *link) ...@@ -10136,7 +10136,7 @@ int bpf_link__unpin(struct bpf_link *link)
err = unlink(link->pin_path); err = unlink(link->pin_path);
if (err != 0) if (err != 0)
return libbpf_err_errno(err); return -errno;
pr_debug("link fd=%d: unpinned from %s\n", link->fd, link->pin_path); pr_debug("link fd=%d: unpinned from %s\n", link->fd, link->pin_path);
zfree(&link->pin_path); zfree(&link->pin_path);
...@@ -11197,7 +11197,7 @@ int perf_buffer__poll(struct perf_buffer *pb, int timeout_ms) ...@@ -11197,7 +11197,7 @@ int perf_buffer__poll(struct perf_buffer *pb, int timeout_ms)
cnt = epoll_wait(pb->epoll_fd, pb->events, pb->cpu_cnt, timeout_ms); cnt = epoll_wait(pb->epoll_fd, pb->events, pb->cpu_cnt, timeout_ms);
if (cnt < 0) if (cnt < 0)
return libbpf_err_errno(cnt); return -errno;
for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) { for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
struct perf_cpu_buf *cpu_buf = pb->events[i].data.ptr; struct perf_cpu_buf *cpu_buf = pb->events[i].data.ptr;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment