Commit af7f5bf2 authored by Mathias Nyman's avatar Mathias Nyman Committed by Sasha Levin

xhci: Handle command completion and timeout race

[ Upstream commit a5a1b951 ]

If we get a command completion event at the same time as the command
timeout work starts on another cpu we might end up aborting the wrong
command.

If the command completion takes the xhci lock before the timeout work, it
will handle the command, pick the next command, mark it as current_cmd, and
re-queue the timeout work. When the timeout work finally gets the lock
It will start aborting the wrong command.

This case can be resolved by checking if the timeout work is pending inside
the timeout function itself. A new timeout work can only be pending if the
command completed and a new command was queued.

If there are no more commands pending then command completion will set
the current_cmd to NULL, which is already handled in the timeout work.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: default avatarBaolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
parent adae8711
...@@ -1270,7 +1270,11 @@ void xhci_handle_command_timeout(unsigned long data) ...@@ -1270,7 +1270,11 @@ void xhci_handle_command_timeout(unsigned long data)
spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags); spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
if (!xhci->current_cmd) { /*
* If timeout work is pending, or current_cmd is NULL, it means we
* raced with command completion. Command is handled so just return.
*/
if (!xhci->current_cmd || timer_pending(&xhci->cmd_timer)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
return; return;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment