Commit b0a59d14 authored by Ahmed S. Darwish's avatar Ahmed S. Darwish Committed by Thomas Gleixner

tools/x86/kcpuid: Recognize all leaves with subleaves

cpuid.csv will be extended in further commits with all-publicly-known
CPUID leaves and bitfields.  Thus, modify has_subleafs() to identify all
known leaves with subleaves.

Remove the redundant "is_amd" check since all x86 vendors already report
the maxium supported extended leaf at leaf 0x80000000 EAX register.

The extra mentioned leaves are:

  - Leaf 0x12, Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) enumeration
  - Leaf 0x14, Intel process trace (PT) enumeration
  - Leaf 0x17, Intel SoC vendor attributes enumeration
  - Leaf 0x1b, Intel PCONFIG (Platform configuration) enumeration
  - Leaf 0x1d, Intel AMX (Advanced Matrix Extensions) tile information
  - Leaf 0x1f, Intel v2 extended topology enumeration
  - Leaf 0x23, Intel ArchPerfmonExt (Architectural PMU ext) enumeration
  - Leaf 0x80000020, AMD Platform QoS extended features enumeration
  - Leaf 0x80000026, AMD v2 extended topology enumeration

Set the 'max_subleaf' variable for all the newly marked leaves with extra
subleaves.  Ideally, this should be fetched from the CSV file instead,
but the current kcpuid code architecture has two runs: one run to
serially invoke the cpuid instructions and save all the output in-memory,
and one run to parse this in-memory output through the CSV specification.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAhmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240718134755.378115-7-darwi@linutronix.de
parent 9ecbc60a
...@@ -98,27 +98,17 @@ static inline void cpuid(u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx, u32 *edx) ...@@ -98,27 +98,17 @@ static inline void cpuid(u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx, u32 *edx)
static inline bool has_subleafs(u32 f) static inline bool has_subleafs(u32 f)
{ {
if (f == 0x7 || f == 0xd) u32 with_subleaves[] = {
return true; 0x4, 0x7, 0xb, 0xd, 0xf, 0x10, 0x12,
0x14, 0x17, 0x18, 0x1b, 0x1d, 0x1f, 0x23,
if (is_amd) { 0x8000001d, 0x80000020, 0x80000026,
if (f == 0x8000001d) };
for (unsigned i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(with_subleaves); i++)
if (f == with_subleaves[i])
return true; return true;
return false;
}
switch (f) { return false;
case 0x4:
case 0xb:
case 0xf:
case 0x10:
case 0x14:
case 0x18:
case 0x1f:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
} }
static void leaf_print_raw(struct subleaf *leaf) static void leaf_print_raw(struct subleaf *leaf)
...@@ -253,11 +243,18 @@ struct cpuid_range *setup_cpuid_range(u32 input_eax) ...@@ -253,11 +243,18 @@ struct cpuid_range *setup_cpuid_range(u32 input_eax)
* Some can provide the exact number of subleafs, * Some can provide the exact number of subleafs,
* others have to be tried (0xf) * others have to be tried (0xf)
*/ */
if (f == 0x7 || f == 0x14 || f == 0x17 || f == 0x18) if (f == 0x7 || f == 0x14 || f == 0x17 || f == 0x18 || f == 0x1d)
max_subleaf = min((eax & 0xff) + 1, max_subleaf); max_subleaf = min((eax & 0xff) + 1, max_subleaf);
if (f == 0xb) if (f == 0xb)
max_subleaf = 2; max_subleaf = 2;
if (f == 0x1f)
max_subleaf = 6;
if (f == 0x23)
max_subleaf = 4;
if (f == 0x80000020)
max_subleaf = 4;
if (f == 0x80000026)
max_subleaf = 5;
for (subleaf = 1; subleaf < max_subleaf; subleaf++) { for (subleaf = 1; subleaf < max_subleaf; subleaf++) {
eax = f; eax = f;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment