Commit b0b595e6 authored by Qu Wenruo's avatar Qu Wenruo Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: tree-checker: fix the wrong output of data backref objectid

[BUG]
There are some reports about invalid data backref objectids, the report
looks like this:

  BTRFS critical (device sda): corrupt leaf: block=333654787489792 slot=110 extent bytenr=333413935558656 len=65536 invalid data ref objectid value 2543

The data ref objectid is the inode number inside the subvolume.

But in above case, the value is completely sane, not really showing the
problem.

[CAUSE]
The root cause of the problem is the deprecated feature, inode cache.

This feature results a special inode number, -12ULL, and it's no longer
recognized by tree-checker, triggering the error.

The direct problem here is the output of data ref objectid. The value
shown is in fact the dref_root (subvolume id), not the dref_objectid
(inode number).

[FIX]
Fix the output to use dref_objectid instead.
Reported-by: default avatarNeil Parton <njparton@gmail.com>
Reported-by: default avatarArchange <archange@archlinux.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAYHqBbrrgmh6UmW3ANbysJX9qG9Pbg3ZwnKsV=5mOpv_qix_Q@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/9541deea-9056-406e-be16-a996b549614d@archlinux.org/
Fixes: f333a3c7 ("btrfs: tree-checker: validate dref root and objectid")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.11
Reviewed-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 7ee85f55
......@@ -1517,7 +1517,7 @@ static int check_extent_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
dref_objectid > BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID)) {
extent_err(leaf, slot,
"invalid data ref objectid value %llu",
dref_root);
dref_objectid);
return -EUCLEAN;
}
if (unlikely(!IS_ALIGNED(dref_offset,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment