Commit b0ec7e55 authored by Tetsuo Handa's avatar Tetsuo Handa Committed by Kalle Valo

ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at ath9k_htc_rxep()

syzbot is reporting lockdep warning followed by kernel panic at
ath9k_htc_rxep() [1], for ath9k_htc_rxep() depends on ath9k_rx_init()
being already completed.

Since ath9k_htc_rxep() is set by ath9k_htc_connect_svc(WMI_BEACON_SVC)
 from ath9k_init_htc_services(), it is possible that ath9k_htc_rxep() is
called via timer interrupt before ath9k_rx_init() from ath9k_init_device()
is called.

Since we can't call ath9k_init_device() before ath9k_init_htc_services(),
let's hold ath9k_htc_rxep() no-op until ath9k_rx_init() completes.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4d2d56175b934b9a7bf9 [1]
Reported-by: default avatarsyzbot <syzbot+4d2d56175b934b9a7bf9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Tested-by: default avatarsyzbot <syzbot+4d2d56175b934b9a7bf9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <quic_kvalo@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2b88f416-b2cb-7a18-d688-951e6dc3fe92@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
parent 01e782c8
...@@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct ath9k_htc_rxbuf { ...@@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct ath9k_htc_rxbuf {
struct ath9k_htc_rx { struct ath9k_htc_rx {
struct list_head rxbuf; struct list_head rxbuf;
spinlock_t rxbuflock; spinlock_t rxbuflock;
bool initialized;
}; };
#define ATH9K_HTC_TX_CLEANUP_INTERVAL 50 /* ms */ #define ATH9K_HTC_TX_CLEANUP_INTERVAL 50 /* ms */
......
...@@ -1130,6 +1130,10 @@ void ath9k_htc_rxep(void *drv_priv, struct sk_buff *skb, ...@@ -1130,6 +1130,10 @@ void ath9k_htc_rxep(void *drv_priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct ath9k_htc_rxbuf *rxbuf = NULL, *tmp_buf = NULL; struct ath9k_htc_rxbuf *rxbuf = NULL, *tmp_buf = NULL;
unsigned long flags; unsigned long flags;
/* Check if ath9k_rx_init() completed. */
if (!data_race(priv->rx.initialized))
goto err;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->rx.rxbuflock, flags); spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->rx.rxbuflock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(tmp_buf, &priv->rx.rxbuf, list) { list_for_each_entry(tmp_buf, &priv->rx.rxbuf, list) {
if (!tmp_buf->in_process) { if (!tmp_buf->in_process) {
...@@ -1185,6 +1189,10 @@ int ath9k_rx_init(struct ath9k_htc_priv *priv) ...@@ -1185,6 +1189,10 @@ int ath9k_rx_init(struct ath9k_htc_priv *priv)
list_add_tail(&rxbuf->list, &priv->rx.rxbuf); list_add_tail(&rxbuf->list, &priv->rx.rxbuf);
} }
/* Allow ath9k_htc_rxep() to operate. */
smp_wmb();
priv->rx.initialized = true;
return 0; return 0;
err: err:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment