drm/amdkfd: Fix circular lock dependency warning
[ 168.544078] ====================================================== [ 168.550309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 168.556523] 5.16.0-kfd-fkuehlin #148 Tainted: G E [ 168.562558] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 168.568764] kfdtest/3479 is trying to acquire lock: [ 168.573672] ffffffffc0927a70 (&topology_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: kfd_topology_device_by_id+0x16/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 168.583663] but task is already holding lock: [ 168.589529] ffff97d303dee668 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0xa9/0x180 [ 168.597755] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 168.605970] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 168.613487] -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: [ 168.619700] lock_acquire+0xca/0x2e0 [ 168.623814] down_read+0x3e/0x140 [ 168.627676] do_user_addr_fault+0x40d/0x690 [ 168.632399] exc_page_fault+0x6f/0x270 [ 168.636692] asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [ 168.641249] filldir64+0xc8/0x1e0 [ 168.645115] call_filldir+0x7c/0x110 [ 168.649238] ext4_readdir+0x58e/0x940 [ 168.653442] iterate_dir+0x16a/0x1b0 [ 168.657558] __x64_sys_getdents64+0x83/0x140 [ 168.662375] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [ 168.666492] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 168.672095] -> #2 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){++++}-{3:3}: [ 168.679008] lock_acquire+0xca/0x2e0 [ 168.683122] down_read+0x3e/0x140 [ 168.686982] path_openat+0x5b2/0xa50 [ 168.691095] do_file_open_root+0xfc/0x190 [ 168.695652] file_open_root+0xd8/0x1b0 [ 168.702010] kernel_read_file_from_path_initns+0xc4/0x140 [ 168.709542] _request_firmware+0x2e9/0x5e0 [ 168.715741] request_firmware+0x32/0x50 [ 168.721667] amdgpu_cgs_get_firmware_info+0x370/0xdd0 [amdgpu] [ 168.730060] smu7_upload_smu_firmware_image+0x53/0x190 [amdgpu] [ 168.738414] fiji_start_smu+0xcf/0x4e0 [amdgpu] [ 168.745539] pp_dpm_load_fw+0x21/0x30 [amdgpu] [ 168.752503] amdgpu_pm_load_smu_firmware+0x4b/0x80 [amdgpu] [ 168.760698] amdgpu_device_fw_loading+0xb8/0x140 [amdgpu] [ 168.768412] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xdf6/0x1716 [amdgpu] [ 168.776285] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x15/0x120 [amdgpu] [ 168.784034] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x19b/0x3a0 [amdgpu] [ 168.791161] local_pci_probe+0x40/0x80 [ 168.797027] work_for_cpu_fn+0x10/0x20 [ 168.802839] process_one_work+0x273/0x5b0 [ 168.808903] worker_thread+0x20f/0x3d0 [ 168.814700] kthread+0x176/0x1a0 [ 168.819968] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 168.825563] -> #1 (&adev->pm.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 168.834721] lock_acquire+0xca/0x2e0 [ 168.840364] __mutex_lock+0xa2/0x930 [ 168.846020] amdgpu_dpm_get_mclk+0x37/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 168.853257] amdgpu_amdkfd_get_local_mem_info+0xba/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 168.861547] kfd_create_vcrat_image_gpu+0x1b1/0xbb0 [amdgpu] [ 168.869478] kfd_create_crat_image_virtual+0x447/0x510 [amdgpu] [ 168.877884] kfd_topology_add_device+0x5c8/0x6f0 [amdgpu] [ 168.885556] kgd2kfd_device_init.cold+0x385/0x4c5 [amdgpu] [ 168.893347] amdgpu_amdkfd_device_init+0x138/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 168.901177] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0x141b/0x1716 [amdgpu] [ 168.909025] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x15/0x120 [amdgpu] [ 168.916458] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x19b/0x3a0 [amdgpu] [ 168.923442] local_pci_probe+0x40/0x80 [ 168.929249] work_for_cpu_fn+0x10/0x20 [ 168.935008] process_one_work+0x273/0x5b0 [ 168.940944] worker_thread+0x20f/0x3d0 [ 168.946623] kthread+0x176/0x1a0 [ 168.951765] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 168.957277] -> #0 (&topology_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 168.965993] check_prev_add+0x8f/0xbf0 [ 168.971613] __lock_acquire+0x1299/0x1ca0 [ 168.977485] lock_acquire+0xca/0x2e0 [ 168.982877] down_read+0x3e/0x140 [ 168.987975] kfd_topology_device_by_id+0x16/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 168.995583] kfd_device_by_id+0xa/0x20 [amdgpu] [ 169.002180] kfd_mmap+0x95/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 169.008293] mmap_region+0x337/0x5a0 [ 169.013679] do_mmap+0x3aa/0x540 [ 169.018678] vm_mmap_pgoff+0xdc/0x180 [ 169.024095] ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x186/0x1f0 [ 169.029734] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [ 169.035005] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 169.041754] other info that might help us debug this: [ 169.053276] Chain exists of: &topology_lock --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#6 --> &mm->mmap_lock#2 [ 169.068389] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 169.076661] CPU0 CPU1 [ 169.082383] ---- ---- [ 169.088087] lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); [ 169.092922] lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6); [ 169.100975] lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); [ 169.108320] lock(&topology_lock); [ 169.112957] *** DEADLOCK *** This commit fixes the deadlock warning by ensuring pm.mutex is not held while holding the topology lock. For this, kfd_local_mem_info is moved into the KFD dev struct and filled during device init. This cached value can then be used instead of querying the value again and again. Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi <mukul.joshi@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment