Commit b196d88a authored by Jason Wang's avatar Jason Wang Committed by David S. Miller

tun: fix use after free for ptr_ring

We used to initialize ptr_ring during TUNSETIFF, this is because its
size depends on the tx_queue_len of netdevice. And we try to clean it
up when socket were detached from netdevice. A race were spotted when
trying to do uninit during a read which will lead a use after free for
pointer ring. Solving this by always initialize a zero size ptr_ring
in open() and do resizing during TUNSETIFF, and then we can safely do
cleanup during close(). With this, there's no need for the workaround
that was introduced by commit 4df0bfc7 ("tun: fix a memory leak
for tfile->tx_array").

Reported-by: syzbot+e8b902c3c3fadf0a9dba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1576d986 ("tun: switch to use skb array for tx")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 9d6b4bfb
......@@ -681,15 +681,6 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile)
skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue);
}
static void tun_cleanup_tx_ring(struct tun_file *tfile)
{
if (tfile->tx_ring.queue) {
ptr_ring_cleanup(&tfile->tx_ring, tun_ptr_free);
xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
memset(&tfile->tx_ring, 0, sizeof(tfile->tx_ring));
}
}
static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
{
struct tun_file *ntfile;
......@@ -736,7 +727,8 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
tun->dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
unregister_netdevice(tun->dev);
}
tun_cleanup_tx_ring(tfile);
if (tun)
xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
}
}
......@@ -783,14 +775,14 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev)
tun_napi_del(tun, tfile);
/* Drop read queue */
tun_queue_purge(tfile);
xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
tun_cleanup_tx_ring(tfile);
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(tfile, tmp, &tun->disabled, next) {
tun_enable_queue(tfile);
tun_queue_purge(tfile);
xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
tun_cleanup_tx_ring(tfile);
}
BUG_ON(tun->numdisabled != 0);
......@@ -834,7 +826,8 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file,
}
if (!tfile->detached &&
ptr_ring_init(&tfile->tx_ring, dev->tx_queue_len, GFP_KERNEL)) {
ptr_ring_resize(&tfile->tx_ring, dev->tx_queue_len,
GFP_KERNEL, tun_ptr_free)) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
......@@ -3219,6 +3212,11 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file * file)
&tun_proto, 0);
if (!tfile)
return -ENOMEM;
if (ptr_ring_init(&tfile->tx_ring, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) {
sk_free(&tfile->sk);
return -ENOMEM;
}
RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
tfile->flags = 0;
tfile->ifindex = 0;
......@@ -3239,8 +3237,6 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file * file)
sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY);
memset(&tfile->tx_ring, 0, sizeof(tfile->tx_ring));
return 0;
}
......@@ -3249,6 +3245,7 @@ static int tun_chr_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
tun_detach(tfile, true);
ptr_ring_cleanup(&tfile->tx_ring, tun_ptr_free);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment