Commit b218f786 authored by Mike Marciniszyn's avatar Mike Marciniszyn Committed by Doug Ledford

IB/hfi1: Use global defines for upper bits in opcode

The awkward coding for setting the allowed_ops field
was tripping an smatch warning.

This patch uses the more appropriate defines from include/rdma
to avoid the issue.

As part of the patch remove a mask that was duplicated
in rdmavt include files and use that mask as appropriate.

Fixes: 8bea6b1cfe6f ("IB/rdmavt: Add create queue pair functionality")
Reported-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
parent 87717f0a
......@@ -829,13 +829,13 @@ struct ib_qp *rvt_create_qp(struct ib_pd *ibpd,
case IB_QPT_SMI:
case IB_QPT_GSI:
case IB_QPT_UD:
qp->allowed_ops = IB_OPCODE_UD_SEND_ONLY & RVT_OPCODE_QP_MASK;
qp->allowed_ops = IB_OPCODE_UD;
break;
case IB_QPT_RC:
qp->allowed_ops = IB_OPCODE_RC_SEND_ONLY & RVT_OPCODE_QP_MASK;
qp->allowed_ops = IB_OPCODE_RC;
break;
case IB_QPT_UC:
qp->allowed_ops = IB_OPCODE_UC_SEND_ONLY & RVT_OPCODE_QP_MASK;
qp->allowed_ops = IB_OPCODE_UC;
break;
default:
ret = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
......
......@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static inline int qp_ok(int opcode, struct hfi1_packet *packet)
if (!(ib_rvt_state_ops[packet->qp->state] & RVT_PROCESS_RECV_OK))
goto dropit;
if (((opcode & OPCODE_QP_MASK) == packet->qp->allowed_ops) ||
if (((opcode & RVT_OPCODE_QP_MASK) == packet->qp->allowed_ops) ||
(opcode == IB_OPCODE_CNP))
return 1;
dropit:
......
......@@ -335,9 +335,6 @@ int hfi1_process_mad(struct ib_device *ibdev, int mad_flags, u8 port,
#endif
#define PSN_MODIFY_MASK 0xFFFFFF
/* Number of bits to pay attention to in the opcode for checking qp type */
#define OPCODE_QP_MASK 0xE0
/*
* Compare the lower 24 bits of the msn values.
* Returns an integer <, ==, or > than zero.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment