Commit b292cf9c authored by Xiaotian Feng's avatar Xiaotian Feng Committed by J. Bruce Fields

sunrpc: fix peername failed on closed listener

There're some warnings of "nfsd: peername failed (err 107)!"
socket error -107 means Transport endpoint is not connected.
This warning message was outputed by svc_tcp_accept() [net/sunrpc/svcsock.c],
when kernel_getpeername returns -107. This means socket might be CLOSED.

And svc_tcp_accept was called by svc_recv() [net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c]

        if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
        <snip>
                newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
        <snip>

So this might happen when xprt->xpt_flags has both XPT_LISTENER and XPT_CLOSE.

Let's take a look at commit b0401d72, this commit has moved the close
processing after do recvfrom method, but this commit also introduces this
warnings, if the xpt_flags has both XPT_LISTENER and XPT_CLOSED, we should
close it, not accpet then close.
Signed-off-by: default avatarXiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
parent 7211a4e8
......@@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
len = 0;
if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
!test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
struct svc_xprt *newxpt;
newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
if (newxpt) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment