RDMA/cxgb4: Use AF_INET for sin_family field

Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well.  Also the values
of PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

//</smpl>
@@
struct sockaddr_in sip;
@@

(
sip.sin_family ==
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family !=
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family =
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
)
//</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>

drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c

@@ -2516,18 +2516,18 @@ static int pass_accept_req(struct c4iw_dev *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		struct sockaddr_in *sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)
 			&child_ep->com.local_addr;
 
-		sin->sin_family = PF_INET;
+		sin->sin_family = AF_INET;
 		sin->sin_port = local_port;
 		sin->sin_addr.s_addr = *(__be32 *)local_ip;
 
 		sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)&child_ep->com.local_addr;
-		sin->sin_family = PF_INET;
+		sin->sin_family = AF_INET;
 		sin->sin_port = ((struct sockaddr_in *)
 				 &parent_ep->com.local_addr)->sin_port;
 		sin->sin_addr.s_addr = *(__be32 *)local_ip;
 
 		sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)&child_ep->com.remote_addr;
-		sin->sin_family = PF_INET;
+		sin->sin_family = AF_INET;
 		sin->sin_port = peer_port;
 		sin->sin_addr.s_addr = *(__be32 *)peer_ip;
 	} else {