Commit b626fd96 authored by David Arinzon's avatar David Arinzon Committed by Jakub Kicinski

net: ena: Refactor napi functions

This patch focuses on changes to the XDP part of the napi
polling routine.

1. Update the `napi_comp` stat only when napi is actually
   complete.
2. Simplify the code by using a function pointer to the right
   napi routine (XDP vs non-XDP path)
3. Remove unnecessary local variables.
4. Adjust a debug print to show the processed XDP frame index
   rather than the pointer.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Arinzon <darinzon@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240101190855.18739-8-darinzon@amazon.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 436c7935
......@@ -1754,18 +1754,28 @@ static void ena_del_napi_in_range(struct ena_adapter *adapter,
static void ena_init_napi_in_range(struct ena_adapter *adapter,
int first_index, int count)
{
int (*napi_handler)(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget);
int i;
for (i = first_index; i < first_index + count; i++) {
struct ena_napi *napi = &adapter->ena_napi[i];
struct ena_ring *rx_ring, *tx_ring;
netif_napi_add(adapter->netdev, &napi->napi,
ENA_IS_XDP_INDEX(adapter, i) ? ena_xdp_io_poll : ena_io_poll);
memset(napi, 0, sizeof(*napi));
rx_ring = &adapter->rx_ring[i];
tx_ring = &adapter->tx_ring[i];
napi_handler = ena_io_poll;
if (ENA_IS_XDP_INDEX(adapter, i))
napi_handler = ena_xdp_io_poll;
netif_napi_add(adapter->netdev, &napi->napi, napi_handler);
if (!ENA_IS_XDP_INDEX(adapter, i))
napi->rx_ring = &adapter->rx_ring[i];
napi->rx_ring = rx_ring;
napi->tx_ring = &adapter->tx_ring[i];
napi->tx_ring = tx_ring;
napi->qid = i;
}
}
......
......@@ -385,23 +385,22 @@ static int ena_clean_xdp_irq(struct ena_ring *tx_ring, u32 budget)
break;
tx_info = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[req_id];
xdpf = tx_info->xdpf;
tx_info->xdpf = NULL;
tx_info->last_jiffies = 0;
ena_unmap_tx_buff(tx_ring, tx_info);
netif_dbg(tx_ring->adapter, tx_done, tx_ring->netdev,
"tx_poll: q %d skb %p completed\n", tx_ring->qid,
xdpf);
xdpf = tx_info->xdpf;
tx_info->xdpf = NULL;
ena_unmap_tx_buff(tx_ring, tx_info);
xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
tx_pkts++;
total_done += tx_info->tx_descs;
xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
tx_ring->free_ids[next_to_clean] = req_id;
next_to_clean = ENA_TX_RING_IDX_NEXT(next_to_clean,
tx_ring->ring_size);
netif_dbg(tx_ring->adapter, tx_done, tx_ring->netdev,
"tx_poll: q %d pkt #%d req_id %d\n", tx_ring->qid, tx_pkts, req_id);
}
tx_ring->next_to_clean = next_to_clean;
......@@ -421,22 +420,19 @@ static int ena_clean_xdp_irq(struct ena_ring *tx_ring, u32 budget)
int ena_xdp_io_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
struct ena_napi *ena_napi = container_of(napi, struct ena_napi, napi);
u32 xdp_work_done, xdp_budget;
struct ena_ring *tx_ring;
int napi_comp_call = 0;
u32 work_done;
int ret;
tx_ring = ena_napi->tx_ring;
xdp_budget = budget;
if (!test_bit(ENA_FLAG_DEV_UP, &tx_ring->adapter->flags) ||
test_bit(ENA_FLAG_TRIGGER_RESET, &tx_ring->adapter->flags)) {
napi_complete_done(napi, 0);
return 0;
}
xdp_work_done = ena_clean_xdp_irq(tx_ring, xdp_budget);
work_done = ena_clean_xdp_irq(tx_ring, budget);
/* If the device is about to reset or down, avoid unmask
* the interrupt and return 0 so NAPI won't reschedule
......@@ -444,18 +440,19 @@ int ena_xdp_io_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if (unlikely(!test_bit(ENA_FLAG_DEV_UP, &tx_ring->adapter->flags))) {
napi_complete_done(napi, 0);
ret = 0;
} else if (xdp_budget > xdp_work_done) {
napi_comp_call = 1;
if (napi_complete_done(napi, xdp_work_done))
} else if (budget > work_done) {
ena_increase_stat(&tx_ring->tx_stats.napi_comp, 1,
&tx_ring->syncp);
if (napi_complete_done(napi, work_done))
ena_unmask_interrupt(tx_ring, NULL);
ena_update_ring_numa_node(tx_ring, NULL);
ret = xdp_work_done;
ret = work_done;
} else {
ret = xdp_budget;
ret = budget;
}
u64_stats_update_begin(&tx_ring->syncp);
tx_ring->tx_stats.napi_comp += napi_comp_call;
tx_ring->tx_stats.tx_poll++;
u64_stats_update_end(&tx_ring->syncp);
tx_ring->tx_stats.last_napi_jiffies = jiffies;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment