Commit b7478cdd authored by Andrea Arcangeli's avatar Andrea Arcangeli Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] parport_pc superio chip fixes

This patch fixes some troubles that somebody reported me with the superio
chips.

In short rmmod parport_pc && cat /proc/iomem was good enough for crashing
the box hard on some machine (and hwscan --printer was doing just that).
The way the oops triggers is that iomem tries to vsprintf the p->name, but
the p->name was a static string in the module address (now unloaded).

The reason is that the superio chip scanning leaves up to two persistent
ranges claimed.  But the second (legacy) pass has no way to notice the
resources are already reclaimed.  Plus if the superio->io was different
than the "io" variable (the range to scan for superio chips) the "io" range
would generate a leak of the original "io" range too.

I simply make sure to always release the requested space during the superio
scan, and I make sure not to istantiate new ranges in the p->base that
would cause the later parport scan to fail too (plus leaving up to leaked
resources).

The previous code that was returning values and was leaving garbage in
there made no sense to me.  My best guess (assuming I didn't misread it ;)
is that probably somebody added the request_region without realizing
they're pointing to the very same address that would be requested later
(and nobody does accesses on those ranges until later, so it was very safe
to claim it later).

Disclaimer: I don't have the specs of the winbond and smsc at hand, I just
guessed what they do from the code (nothing checks superio->io except
get_superio_dma get_superio_irq, which made the thing enough self
explainatory to fix it without specs)
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrea Arcangeli <andrea@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 44c4fb89
......@@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ struct parport_operations parport_pc_ops =
#ifdef CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_SUPERIO
/* Super-IO chipset detection, Winbond, SMSC */
static int __devinit show_parconfig_smsc37c669(int io, int key)
static void __devinit show_parconfig_smsc37c669(int io, int key)
{
int cr1,cr4,cra,cr23,cr26,cr27,i=0;
static const char *modes[]={ "SPP and Bidirectional (PS/2)",
......@@ -1261,26 +1261,17 @@ static int __devinit show_parconfig_smsc37c669(int io, int key)
superios[i].io = 0x278;
superios[i].irq = 5;
}
if (io != superios[i].io) {
/* how many bytes? */
if (!request_region(superios[i].io, 3, "smsc parport")) {
superios[i].io = 0;
return 0;
}
}
d=(cr26 &0x0f);
if((d==1) || (d==3))
superios[i].dma= d;
else
superios[i].dma= PARPORT_DMA_NONE;
return 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
static int __devinit show_parconfig_winbond(int io, int key)
static void __devinit show_parconfig_winbond(int io, int key)
{
int cr30,cr60,cr61,cr70,cr74,crf0,i=0;
static const char *modes[] = {
......@@ -1336,23 +1327,14 @@ static int __devinit show_parconfig_winbond(int io, int key)
printk(KERN_INFO "Super-IO: too many chips!\n");
else {
superios[i].io = (cr60<<8)|cr61;
if (io != superios[i].io) {
/* how many bytes? */
if (!request_region(superios[i].io, 3, "winbond parport")) {
superios[i].io = 0;
return 0;
}
}
superios[i].irq = cr70&0x0f;
superios[i].dma = (((cr74 & 0x07) > 3) ?
PARPORT_DMA_NONE : (cr74 & 0x07));
return 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
static int __devinit decode_winbond(int efer, int key, int devid, int devrev, int oldid)
static void __devinit decode_winbond(int efer, int key, int devid, int devrev, int oldid)
{
const char *type = "unknown";
int id,progif=2;
......@@ -1360,7 +1342,7 @@ static int __devinit decode_winbond(int efer, int key, int devid, int devrev, in
if (devid == devrev)
/* simple heuristics, we happened to read some
non-winbond register */
return 0;
return;
id=(devid<<8) | devrev;
......@@ -1385,20 +1367,19 @@ static int __devinit decode_winbond(int efer, int key, int devid, int devrev, in
efer, key, devid, devrev, oldid, type);
if (progif == 2)
return show_parconfig_winbond(efer,key);
return 0;
show_parconfig_winbond(efer,key);
}
static int __devinit decode_smsc(int efer, int key, int devid, int devrev)
static void __devinit decode_smsc(int efer, int key, int devid, int devrev)
{
const char *type = "unknown";
int (*func)(int io, int key);
void (*func)(int io, int key);
int id;
if (devid == devrev)
/* simple heuristics, we happened to read some
non-smsc register */
return 0;
return;
func=NULL;
id=(devid<<8) | devrev;
......@@ -1414,8 +1395,7 @@ static int __devinit decode_smsc(int efer, int key, int devid, int devrev)
efer, key, devid, devrev, type);
if (func)
return func(efer,key);
return 0;
func(efer,key);
}
......@@ -1448,8 +1428,7 @@ static void __devinit winbond_check(int io, int key)
if ((x_devid == devid) && (x_devrev == devrev) && (x_oldid == oldid))
goto out; /* protection against false positives */
if (decode_winbond(io,key,devid,devrev,oldid));
return;
decode_winbond(io,key,devid,devrev,oldid);
out:
release_region(io, 3);
}
......@@ -1482,8 +1461,7 @@ static void __devinit winbond_check2(int io,int key)
if ((x_devid == devid) && (x_devrev == devrev) && (x_oldid == oldid))
goto out; /* protection against false positives */
if (decode_winbond(io,key,devid,devrev,oldid))
return;
decode_winbond(io,key,devid,devrev,oldid);
out:
release_region(io, 3);
}
......@@ -1522,8 +1500,7 @@ static void __devinit smsc_check(int io, int key)
(x_oldid == oldid) && (x_rev == rev))
goto out; /* protection against false positives */
if (decode_smsc(io,key,oldid,oldrev))
return;
decode_smsc(io,key,oldid,oldrev);
out:
release_region(io, 3);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment