Commit b7fbf4ce authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI: glue: Rearrange find_child_checks()

Notice that it is not necessary to evaluate _STA in find_child_checks()
if the device is expected to have children, but there are none, so
move the children check to the front of the function.

Also notice that FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE can be returned right away if
_STA is missing, so make the function do so.

Finally, replace the ternary operator in the return statement argument
with an if () and a standalone return which is somewhat easier to
follow.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent c5eb0a61
......@@ -79,17 +79,17 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type *acpi_get_bus_type(struct device *dev)
static int find_child_checks(struct acpi_device *adev, bool check_children)
{
bool sta_present = true;
unsigned long long sta;
acpi_status status;
if (check_children && list_empty(&adev->children))
return -ENODEV;
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta);
if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
sta_present = false;
else if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED))
return -ENODEV;
return FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
if (check_children && list_empty(&adev->children))
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED))
return -ENODEV;
/*
......@@ -99,8 +99,10 @@ static int find_child_checks(struct acpi_device *adev, bool check_children)
* matched going forward. [This means a second spec violation in a row,
* so whatever we do here is best effort anyway.]
*/
return sta_present && !adev->pnp.type.platform_id ?
FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE : FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
if (adev->pnp.type.platform_id)
return FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
return FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE;
}
struct acpi_device *acpi_find_child_device(struct acpi_device *parent,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment