Commit b80b549c authored by Mark Fasheh's avatar Mark Fasheh

ocfs2: re-order ocfs2_empty_dir checks

ocfs2_empty_dir() is far more expensive than checking link count. Since both
need to be checked at the same time, we can improve performance by checking
link count first.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
parent 3a8df2b9
......@@ -834,10 +834,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir,
child_locked = 1;
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
if (!ocfs2_empty_dir(inode)) {
status = -ENOTEMPTY;
goto leave;
} else if (inode->i_nlink != 2) {
if (inode->i_nlink != 2 || !ocfs2_empty_dir(inode)) {
status = -ENOTEMPTY;
goto leave;
}
......@@ -1280,8 +1277,8 @@ static int ocfs2_rename(struct inode *old_dir,
if (target_exists) {
if (S_ISDIR(new_inode->i_mode)) {
if (!ocfs2_empty_dir(new_inode) ||
new_inode->i_nlink != 2) {
if (new_inode->i_nlink != 2 ||
!ocfs2_empty_dir(new_inode)) {
status = -ENOTEMPTY;
goto bail;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment