Commit b8e2bd98 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915/gt: Decouple completed requests on unwind

Since the introduction of preempt-to-busy, requests can complete in the
background, even while they are not on the engine->active.requests list.
As such, the engine->active.request list itself is not in strict
retirement order, and we have to scan the entire list while unwinding to
not miss any. However, if the request is completed we currently leave it
on the list [until retirement], but we could just as simply remove it
and stop treating it as active. We would only have to then traverse it
once while unwinding in quick succession.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201126140407.31952-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent 977933b5
......@@ -1116,8 +1116,10 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(rq, rn,
&engine->active.requests,
sched.link) {
if (i915_request_completed(rq))
continue; /* XXX */
if (i915_request_completed(rq)) {
list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
continue;
}
__i915_request_unsubmit(rq);
......
......@@ -321,7 +321,8 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
* after removing the breadcrumb and signaling it, so that we do not
* inadvertently attach the breadcrumb to a completed request.
*/
remove_from_engine(rq);
if (!list_empty(&rq->sched.link))
remove_from_engine(rq);
GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
__list_del_entry(&rq->link); /* poison neither prev/next (RCU walks) */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment