Commit bae141f5 authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Emit audit messages upon successful prog load and unload

Allow for audit messages to be emitted upon BPF program load and
unload for having a timeline of events. The load itself is in
syscall context, so additional info about the process initiating
the BPF prog creation can be logged and later directly correlated
to the unload event.

The only info really needed from BPF side is the globally unique
prog ID where then audit user space tooling can query / dump all
info needed about the specific BPF program right upon load event
and enrich the record, thus these changes needed here can be kept
small and non-intrusive to the core.

Raw example output:

  # auditctl -D
  # auditctl -a always,exit -F arch=x86_64 -S bpf
  # ausearch --start recent -m 1334
  ...
  ----
  time->Wed Nov 27 16:04:13 2019
  type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1574867053.120:84664): proctitle="./bpf"
  type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1574867053.120:84664): arch=c000003e syscall=321   \
    success=yes exit=3 a0=5 a1=7ffea484fbe0 a2=70 a3=0 items=0 ppid=7477    \
    pid=12698 auid=1001 uid=1001 gid=1001 euid=1001 suid=1001 fsuid=1001    \
    egid=1001 sgid=1001 fsgid=1001 tty=pts2 ses=4 comm="bpf"                \
    exe="/home/jolsa/auditd/audit-testsuite/tests/bpf/bpf"                  \
    subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
  type=UNKNOWN[1334] msg=audit(1574867053.120:84664): prog-id=76 op=LOAD
  ----
  time->Wed Nov 27 16:04:13 2019
  type=UNKNOWN[1334] msg=audit(1574867053.120:84665): prog-id=76 op=UNLOAD
  ...
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Co-developed-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191206214934.11319-1-jolsa@kernel.org
parent b590cb5f
......@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@
#define AUDIT_FANOTIFY 1331 /* Fanotify access decision */
#define AUDIT_TIME_INJOFFSET 1332 /* Timekeeping offset injected */
#define AUDIT_TIME_ADJNTPVAL 1333 /* NTP value adjustment */
#define AUDIT_BPF 1334 /* BPF subsystem */
#define AUDIT_AVC 1400 /* SE Linux avc denial or grant */
#define AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR 1401 /* Internal SE Linux Errors */
......
......@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/nospec.h>
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include <uapi/linux/btf.h>
#define IS_FD_ARRAY(map) ((map)->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY || \
......@@ -1306,6 +1307,36 @@ static int find_prog_type(enum bpf_prog_type type, struct bpf_prog *prog)
return 0;
}
enum bpf_audit {
BPF_AUDIT_LOAD,
BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD,
BPF_AUDIT_MAX,
};
static const char * const bpf_audit_str[BPF_AUDIT_MAX] = {
[BPF_AUDIT_LOAD] = "LOAD",
[BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD] = "UNLOAD",
};
static void bpf_audit_prog(const struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned int op)
{
struct audit_context *ctx = NULL;
struct audit_buffer *ab;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(op >= BPF_AUDIT_MAX))
return;
if (audit_enabled == AUDIT_OFF)
return;
if (op == BPF_AUDIT_LOAD)
ctx = audit_context();
ab = audit_log_start(ctx, GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_BPF);
if (unlikely(!ab))
return;
audit_log_format(ab, "prog-id=%u op=%s",
prog->aux->id, bpf_audit_str[op]);
audit_log_end(ab);
}
int __bpf_prog_charge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
{
unsigned long memlock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
......@@ -1421,6 +1452,7 @@ static void __bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
{
if (atomic64_dec_and_test(&prog->aux->refcnt)) {
perf_event_bpf_event(prog, PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_UNLOAD, 0);
bpf_audit_prog(prog, BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD);
/* bpf_prog_free_id() must be called first */
bpf_prog_free_id(prog, do_idr_lock);
__bpf_prog_put_noref(prog, true);
......@@ -1830,6 +1862,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
*/
bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(prog);
perf_event_bpf_event(prog, PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_LOAD, 0);
bpf_audit_prog(prog, BPF_AUDIT_LOAD);
err = bpf_prog_new_fd(prog);
if (err < 0)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment