Commit baedbe55 authored by Ido Schimmel's avatar Ido Schimmel Committed by David S. Miller

bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of LLDP packets

Commit 8626c56c ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook
returns QUEUE or STOLEN verdict") caused LLDP packets arriving through a
bridge port to be re-injected to the Rx path with skb->dev set to the
bridge device, but this breaks the lldpad daemon.

The lldpad daemon opens a packet socket with protocol set to ETH_P_LLDP
for any valid device on the system, which doesn't not include soft
devices such as bridge and VLAN.

Since packet sockets (ptype_base) are processed in the Rx path after the
Rx handler, LLDP packets with skb->dev set to the bridge device never
reach the lldpad daemon.

Fix this by making the bridge's Rx handler re-inject LLDP packets with
RX_HANDLER_PASS, which effectively restores the behaviour prior to the
mentioned commit.

This means netfilter will never receive LLDP packets coming through a
bridge port, as I don't see a way in which we can have okfn() consume
the packet without breaking existing behaviour. I've already carried out
a similar fix for STP packets in commit 56fae404 ("bridge: Fix
incorrect re-injection of STP packets").

Fixes: 8626c56c ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook returns QUEUE or STOLEN verdict")
Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 9b974202
......@@ -283,6 +283,14 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
case 0x01: /* IEEE MAC (Pause) */
goto drop;
case 0x0E: /* 802.1AB LLDP */
fwd_mask |= p->br->group_fwd_mask;
if (fwd_mask & (1u << dest[5]))
goto forward;
*pskb = skb;
__br_handle_local_finish(skb);
return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
default:
/* Allow selective forwarding for most other protocols */
fwd_mask |= p->br->group_fwd_mask;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment