Commit bb3485c8 authored by Vincent Guittot's avatar Vincent Guittot Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/fair: Fix load_balance redo for !imbalance

It can happen that load_balance() finds a busiest group and then a
busiest rq but the calculated imbalance is in fact 0.

In such situation, detach_tasks() returns immediately and lets the
flag LBF_ALL_PINNED set. The busiest CPU is then wrongly assumed to
have pinned tasks and removed from the load balance mask. then, we
redo a load balance without the busiest CPU. This creates wrong load
balance situation and generates wrong task migration.

If the calculated imbalance is 0, it's useless to try to find a
busiest rq as no task will be migrated and we can return immediately.

This situation can happen with heterogeneous system or smp system when
RT tasks are decreasing the capacity of some CPUs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: jhugo@codeaurora.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536306664-29827-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 287cdaac
...@@ -8275,7 +8275,7 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env) ...@@ -8275,7 +8275,7 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
force_balance: force_balance:
/* Looks like there is an imbalance. Compute it */ /* Looks like there is an imbalance. Compute it */
calculate_imbalance(env, &sds); calculate_imbalance(env, &sds);
return sds.busiest; return env->imbalance ? sds.busiest : NULL;
out_balanced: out_balanced:
env->imbalance = 0; env->imbalance = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment