Commit bb789e03 authored by Hans Verkuil's avatar Hans Verkuil Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

media: cec: improve transmit timeout logging

Kernel logging messes up the upcoming low-level CEC monitoring support
which is very time-sensitive. So change the debug level of this message
but keep a counter that is shown in the debugfs status log.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
parent 15e809e9
......@@ -394,13 +394,17 @@ int cec_thread_func(void *_adap)
if (adap->transmitting && timeout) {
/*
* If we timeout, then log that. This really shouldn't
* happen and is an indication of a faulty CEC adapter
* driver, or the CEC bus is in some weird state.
* If we timeout, then log that. Normally this does
* not happen and it is an indication of a faulty CEC
* adapter driver, or the CEC bus is in some weird
* state. On rare occasions it can happen if there is
* so much traffic on the bus that the adapter was
* unable to transmit for CEC_XFER_TIMEOUT_MS (2.1s).
*/
dprintk(0, "%s: message %*ph timed out!\n", __func__,
dprintk(1, "%s: message %*ph timed out\n", __func__,
adap->transmitting->msg.len,
adap->transmitting->msg.msg);
adap->tx_timeouts++;
/* Just give up on this. */
cec_data_cancel(adap->transmitting);
goto unlock;
......@@ -1951,6 +1955,11 @@ int cec_adap_status(struct seq_file *file, void *priv)
if (adap->monitor_all_cnt)
seq_printf(file, "file handles in Monitor All mode: %u\n",
adap->monitor_all_cnt);
if (adap->tx_timeouts) {
seq_printf(file, "transmit timeouts: %u\n",
adap->tx_timeouts);
adap->tx_timeouts = 0;
}
data = adap->transmitting;
if (data)
seq_printf(file, "transmitting message: %*ph (reply: %02x, timeout: %ums)\n",
......
......@@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ struct cec_adapter {
bool passthrough;
struct cec_log_addrs log_addrs;
u32 tx_timeouts;
#ifdef CONFIG_CEC_NOTIFIER
struct cec_notifier *notifier;
#endif
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment