md-cluster: fix deadlock issue when add disk to an recoverying array
Add a disk to an array which is performing recovery is a little complicated, we need to do both reap the sync thread and perform add disk for the case, then it caused deadlock as follows. linux44:~ # ps aux|grep md|grep D root 1822 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D 16:50 0:00 [md127_resync] root 1848 0.0 0.0 19860 952 pts/0 D+ 16:50 0:00 mdadm --manage /dev/md127 --re-add /dev/vdb linux44:~ # cat /proc/1848/stack [<ffffffff8107afde>] kthread_stop+0x6e/0x120 [<ffffffffa051ddb0>] md_unregister_thread+0x40/0x80 [md_mod] [<ffffffffa0526e45>] md_reap_sync_thread+0x15/0x150 [md_mod] [<ffffffffa05271e0>] action_store+0x260/0x270 [md_mod] [<ffffffffa05206b4>] md_attr_store+0xb4/0x100 [md_mod] [<ffffffff81214a7e>] sysfs_write_file+0xbe/0x140 [<ffffffff811a6b98>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x1e0 [<ffffffff811a75b8>] SyS_write+0x48/0xa0 [<ffffffff8152a5c9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<00007f068ea1ed30>] 0x7f068ea1ed30 linux44:~ # cat /proc/1822/stack [<ffffffffa05251a6>] md_do_sync+0x846/0xf40 [md_mod] [<ffffffffa052402d>] md_thread+0x16d/0x180 [md_mod] [<ffffffff8107ad94>] kthread+0xb4/0xc0 [<ffffffff8152a518>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 Task1848 Task1822 md_attr_store (held reconfig_mutex by call mddev_lock()) action_store md_reap_sync_thread md_unregister_thread kthread_stop md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread); wait_event(mddev->sb_wait, !test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING)) md_check_recovery is triggered by wakeup mddev->thread, but it can't clear MD_CHANGE_PENDING flag since it can't get lock which was held by md_attr_store already. To solve the deadlock problem, we move "->resync_finish()" from md_do_sync to md_reap_sync_thread (after md_update_sb), also MD_HELD_RESYNC_LOCK is introduced since it is possible that node can't get resync lock in md_do_sync. Then we do not need to wait for MD_CHANGE_PENDING is cleared or not since metadata should be updated after md_update_sb, so just call resync_finish if MD_HELD_RESYNC_LOCK is set. We also unified the code after skip label, since set PENDING for non-clustered case should be harmless. Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment