Commit be55d8e7 authored by Steven Rostedt's avatar Steven Rostedt Committed by Luis Henriques

tracing: Have filter check for balanced ops

commit 2cf30dc1 upstream.

When the following filter is used it causes a warning to trigger:

 # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
 # echo "((dev==1)blocks==2)" > events/ext4/ext4_truncate_exit/filter
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
 # cat events/ext4/ext4_truncate_exit/filter
((dev==1)blocks==2)
^
parse_error: No error

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1223 at kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c:1640 replace_preds+0x3c5/0x990()
 Modules linked in: bnep lockd grace bluetooth  ...
 CPU: 3 PID: 1223 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W       4.1.0-rc3-test+ #450
 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v02.05 05/07/2012
  0000000000000668 ffff8800c106bc98 ffffffff816ed4f9 ffff88011ead0cf0
  0000000000000000 ffff8800c106bcd8 ffffffff8107fb07 ffffffff8136b46c
  ffff8800c7d81d48 ffff8800d4c2bc00 ffff8800d4d4f920 00000000ffffffea
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff816ed4f9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x6e
  [<ffffffff8107fb07>] warn_slowpath_common+0x97/0xe0
  [<ffffffff8136b46c>] ? _kstrtoull+0x2c/0x80
  [<ffffffff8107fb6a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
  [<ffffffff81159065>] replace_preds+0x3c5/0x990
  [<ffffffff811596b2>] create_filter+0x82/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81159944>] apply_event_filter+0xd4/0x180
  [<ffffffff81152bbf>] event_filter_write+0x8f/0x120
  [<ffffffff811db2a8>] __vfs_write+0x28/0xe0
  [<ffffffff811dda43>] ? __sb_start_write+0x53/0xf0
  [<ffffffff812e51e0>] ? security_file_permission+0x30/0xc0
  [<ffffffff811dc408>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x1b0
  [<ffffffff811dc72f>] SyS_write+0x4f/0xb0
  [<ffffffff816f5217>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
 ---[ end trace e11028bd95818dcd ]---

Worse yet, reading the error message (the filter again) it says that
there was no error, when there clearly was. The issue is that the
code that checks the input does not check for balanced ops. That is,
having an op between a closed parenthesis and the next token.

This would only cause a warning, and fail out before doing any real
harm, but it should still not caues a warning, and the error reported
should work:

 # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
 # echo "((dev==1)blocks==2)" > events/ext4/ext4_truncate_exit/filter
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
 # cat events/ext4/ext4_truncate_exit/filter
((dev==1)blocks==2)
^
parse_error: Meaningless filter expression

And give no kernel warning.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150615175025.7e809215@gandalf.local.home

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Reported-by: default avatarVince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Tested-by: default avatarVince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
[ luis: backported to 3.16:
  - unconditionally decrement cnt as the OP_NOT logic was introduced only
    by e12c09cf ("tracing: Add NOT to filtering logic") ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
parent 9b93bf71
...@@ -1399,19 +1399,24 @@ static int check_preds(struct filter_parse_state *ps) ...@@ -1399,19 +1399,24 @@ static int check_preds(struct filter_parse_state *ps)
{ {
int n_normal_preds = 0, n_logical_preds = 0; int n_normal_preds = 0, n_logical_preds = 0;
struct postfix_elt *elt; struct postfix_elt *elt;
int cnt = 0;
list_for_each_entry(elt, &ps->postfix, list) { list_for_each_entry(elt, &ps->postfix, list) {
if (elt->op == OP_NONE) if (elt->op == OP_NONE) {
cnt++;
continue; continue;
}
cnt--;
if (elt->op == OP_AND || elt->op == OP_OR) { if (elt->op == OP_AND || elt->op == OP_OR) {
n_logical_preds++; n_logical_preds++;
continue; continue;
} }
n_normal_preds++; n_normal_preds++;
WARN_ON_ONCE(cnt < 0);
} }
if (!n_normal_preds || n_logical_preds >= n_normal_preds) { if (cnt != 1 || !n_normal_preds || n_logical_preds >= n_normal_preds) {
parse_error(ps, FILT_ERR_INVALID_FILTER, 0); parse_error(ps, FILT_ERR_INVALID_FILTER, 0);
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment