Commit bf4086b1 authored by Marc Zyngier's avatar Marc Zyngier

KVM: arm64: Prevent vcpu_has_ptrauth from generating OOL functions

So far, vcpu_has_ptrauth() is implemented in terms of system_supports_*_auth()
calls, which are declared "inline". In some specific conditions (clang
and SCS), the "inline" very much turns into an "out of line", which
leads to a fireworks when this predicate is evaluated on a non-VHE
system (right at the beginning of __hyp_handle_ptrauth).

Instead, make sure vcpu_has_ptrauth gets expanded inline by directly
using the cpus_have_final_cap() helpers, which are __always_inline,
generate much better code, and are the only thing that make sense when
running at EL2 on a nVHE system.

Fixes: 29eb5a3c ("KVM: arm64: Handle PtrAuth traps early")
Reported-by: default avatarNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reported-by: default avatarNick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Tested-by: default avatarNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722162231.3689767-1-maz@kernel.org
parent b9e10d4a
...@@ -380,9 +380,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { ...@@ -380,9 +380,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
#define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \ #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \
((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE)) ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE))
#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) ((system_supports_address_auth() || \ #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
system_supports_generic_auth()) && \ #define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) \
((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH)) ((cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH) || \
cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH)) && \
(vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH)
#else
#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) false
#endif
#define vcpu_gp_regs(v) (&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs) #define vcpu_gp_regs(v) (&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment