drm/msm/dp: Return IRQ_NONE for unhandled interrupts
If our interrupt handler gets called and we don't really handle the interrupt then we should return IRQ_NONE. The current interrupt handler didn't do this, so let's fix it. NOTE: for some of the cases it's clear that we should return IRQ_NONE and some cases it's clear that we should return IRQ_HANDLED. However, there are a few that fall somewhere in between. Specifically, the documentation for when to return IRQ_NONE vs. IRQ_HANDLED is probably best spelled out in the commit message of commit d9e4ad5b ("Document that IRQ_NONE should be returned when IRQ not actually handled"). That commit makes it clear that we should return IRQ_HANDLED if we've done something to make the interrupt stop happening. The case where it's unclear is, for instance, in dp_aux_isr() after we've read the interrupt using dp_catalog_aux_get_irq() and confirmed that "isr" is non-zero. The function dp_catalog_aux_get_irq() not only reads the interrupts but it also "ack"s all the interrupts that are returned. For an "unknown" interrupt this has a very good chance of actually stopping the interrupt from happening. That would mean we've identified that it's our device and done something to stop them from happening and should return IRQ_HANDLED. Specifically, it should be noted that most interrupts that need "ack"ing are ones that are one-time events and doing an "ack" is enough to clear them. However, since these interrupts are unknown then, by definition, it's unknown if "ack"ing them is truly enough to clear them. It's possible that we also need to remove the original source of the interrupt. In this case, IRQ_NONE would be a better choice. Given that returning an occasional IRQ_NONE isn't the absolute end of the world, however, let's choose that course of action. The IRQ framework will forgive a few IRQ_NONE returns now and again (and it won't even log them, which is why we have to log them ourselves). This means that if we _do_ end hitting an interrupt where "ack"ing isn't enough the kernel will eventually detect the problem and shut our device down. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Tested-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/520660/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230126170745.v2.2.I2d7aec2fadb9c237cd0090a47d6a8ba2054bf0f8@changeid [DB: reformatted commit message to make checkpatch happy] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment