Commit c00b2750 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Ingo Molnar

uprobes: Optimize is_swbp_at_addr() for current->mm

Change is_swbp_at_addr() to try to avoid the costly
read_opcode() if mm == current->mm, __copy_from_user_inatomic()
should succeed in the likely case.

Currently this optimization is not important, but we are going
to add more is_swbp_at_addr(current->mm) callers.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529192744.GA8057@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 436d03fa
......@@ -333,10 +333,20 @@ static int is_swbp_at_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
uprobe_opcode_t opcode;
int result;
if (current->mm == mm) {
pagefault_disable();
result = __copy_from_user_inatomic(&opcode, (void __user*)vaddr,
sizeof(opcode));
pagefault_enable();
if (likely(result == 0))
goto out;
}
result = read_opcode(mm, vaddr, &opcode);
if (result)
return result;
out:
if (is_swbp_insn(&opcode))
return 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment