mm/hugetlb: check gigantic_page_runtime_supported() in return_unused_surplus_pages()
Patch series "mm, hwpoison: enable 1GB hugepage support", v7. This patch (of 8): I found a weird state of 1GB hugepage pool, caused by the following procedure: - run a process reserving all free 1GB hugepages, - shrink free 1GB hugepage pool to zero (i.e. writing 0 to /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages), then - kill the reserving process. , then all the hugepages are free *and* surplus at the same time. $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages 3 $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/free_hugepages 3 $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/resv_hugepages 0 $ cat /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/surplus_hugepages 3 This state is resolved by reserving and allocating the pages then freeing them again, so this seems not to result in serious problem. But it's a little surprising (shrinking pool suddenly fails). This behavior is caused by hstate_is_gigantic() check in return_unused_surplus_pages(). This was introduced so long ago in 2008 by commit aa888a74 ("hugetlb: support larger than MAX_ORDER"), and at that time the gigantic pages were not supposed to be allocated/freed at run-time. Now kernel can support runtime allocation/free, so let's check gigantic_page_runtime_supported() together. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220714042420.1847125-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220714042420.1847125-2-naoya.horiguchi@linux.devSigned-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment